Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Former EPA leader: ‘Irresponsible’ for US to halt nuclear power [View all]Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)17. Until solar and wind can generate on-demand 24/7 we need something else
Solar is off half the day.
Wind all depends on the weather.
Neither can be turned up and down on demand.
So while they are good, and we should be using them as much as possible when they do generate, we need something else to make the baseload power.
Hydro does some, but we are past the era of ever building another dam and flooding people out of house and home.
That leaves coal, natural gas, or nuclear.
We all know the issues with coal.
Natural gas primary comes from fracking these day.
Of the 3 choices, nuclear seems to generate the least pollution, the least waste, and be the best long-term option of 3 less than perfect options.
The biggest hurdles are political, not scientific.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fukushima has not only killed starfish but irradiated dolphins in the Atlantic.
zappaman
Oct 2014
#1
I know that you and reality had a messy divorce due to irreconcilable differences...
FBaggins
Oct 2014
#24
And you still think that's somehow connected to demon cores at Fukushima, right?
FBaggins
Oct 2014
#25