Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are we ever going to get tired enough of school shootings that we actually do something about them? [View all]ManiacJoe
(10,138 posts)168. You really need to take a deep breath and think about what you are trying to say.
I'm sure they stored all those nice harmless guns properly and safely at that gun range where the little girl blew away that war veteran who was assisting her with a machine gun she had no business being near, or touching, much less being allowed to shoot.
Of course not. The girl was actively shooting the gun at the targets on the gun range. But you already know that.
There's always some reason why people who want to curtail or regulate guns are wrong or ill-informed or whatever the excuse is on this particular day.
Yes, usually -- but not always -- there is a reason. The reason for most folks is ignorance of the subject matter; that is relatively easy to fix as long as the person is willing to learn. For other folks the reason is purposeful misinformation; the truth and facts do not work well for their agenda.
Nothing you said in the post above changes anything, or the results that happened and were factual and horrible and murderous and completely unnecessary - as in DIDN'T HAVE TO HAPPEN. No excuse you gave, no hairs you split, no technicalities you mentioned.
Very true. Nothing I said changes the facts. All I did was correct your misconceptions so that you now know the facts and can have a knowledgeable conversation. I gave no excuses. You entered a technical discussion you did not understand. You have been corrected in your misuse of the technical terms. The socially acceptable response from you should have been a simple "Thank you."
And I'm also sure that she probably thought there was no problem and no danger and, if her arsenal was not properly stored or secured by the book, well, why bother, then? There's always that canard that people fall back upon - "NUTHIN'S GUNNA HAPPEN..."
And that attitude is the way bad things happen. She knew there was a large problem with her child. She chose not to do the simple and necessary steps to prevent such a tragedy. She gets no sympathy or forgiveness from me. Hopefully she gets none from you.
It wasn't a whole buncha guns. Oh you have the label wrong. Oh you're not describing it correctly.
Proper terminology is important for intelligent discussions. You are not required to use the labels and tags; but if you misuse them, do expect to get called on it. If you don't know the proper labels and tags, you can easily use the long descriptions instead, which is perfectly fine. If you have questions, please ask. There are lots of knowledgeable folks here who are happy to help you.
There's always a reason, isn't there? There's ALWAYS an excuse, isn't there? There's ALWAYS a loophole, isn't there! There's ALWAYS a justification as to why we can't do anything about it. We can't even be allowed to ATTEMPT to do anything about it.
There are lots of reasons that many of the attempts to do "something" fail, most of them are technical in nature. I know of no reason or excuse not to try; there just need to be intelligence backing the try.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
230 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are we ever going to get tired enough of school shootings that we actually do something about them? [View all]
dsc
Oct 2014
OP
I love my country, but it embarrasses the shit out of me these days. n/t
A HERETIC I AM
Oct 2014
#20
Nah...they would rather turn the schools for the "poor kids" into prison camps
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2014
#4
the poor ones already refuse to allow their angels to ride the school buses with the
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2014
#179
The news here said he was given the gun for his last birthday. Hard to lock up a gift you gave your
lunasun
Oct 2014
#48
Unless your theory is that our children are somehow worse than those of every single solitary
dsc
Oct 2014
#16
Canada has lots of guns, but they have very few mass shootings in comparison to the US.
ZombieHorde
Oct 2014
#21
Sure, but do you really think laws like that would have stopped any school shootings in the US?
ZombieHorde
Oct 2014
#29
Granting that, do you think laws can significantly reduce the number of guns out there?
Recursion
Oct 2014
#223
His father gave him a gun for his birthday.not sure if it was registered or not but registering
lunasun
Oct 2014
#54
Indeed. But let's look at that statement from the viewpoint of the assholes who've used
calimary
Oct 2014
#204
So, someone kills your meat for you, right? You hire it out, rather than get your hands dirty?
X_Digger
Oct 2014
#222
No better medicine combined with an older population has been almost wholly responsible for that
dsc
Oct 2014
#39
i think people are just supposed to be happy that it wasn't ISIS or Ebola that kills them
JI7
Oct 2014
#12
Sadly no, not until the NRA is denounced as a terrorist organization and banned from existence.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Oct 2014
#15
Which ain't never going to happen because tha NRA isn't a terrorist organization.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#73
Sure it does. The NRA promotes the use of unsafe firearms that are used to commit terrorist acts. That makes it a terrorist organization.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Oct 2014
#209
So you think AR-15's, for example, that can deliver multiple shots per sec using clips w/ dozens of rounds is a safe weapon protected under the 1st Amendmt?
InAbLuEsTaTe
Oct 2014
#213
And I am sure the RW would love to do the same for planned parenthood and the ACLU
hack89
Oct 2014
#27
I'm not the one wanting to curb a civil right just because I don't like the message.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#100
No, this is about your wanting to shut down an organization that you disagree with.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#109
The NRA has killed the spirit and resolve of gun control proponents and politicians.
branford
Oct 2014
#145
You realize you are calling for censorship and oppression by the Government?
NutmegYankee
Oct 2014
#148
A lot of people believe in free speech, except when they don't agree . . . nt
branford
Oct 2014
#169
Uh-huh... I'll bet the mother of that kid who blew away all those children at Sandy Hook
calimary
Oct 2014
#142
You really need to take a deep breath and think about what you are trying to say.
ManiacJoe
Oct 2014
#168
No, the real problem there is that the AWB didn't do what its supporters think it did
Recursion
Oct 2014
#221
We also need to frame it differently. Dumbed-down so more of the low-information voters can start
calimary
Oct 2014
#41
I think we know. Gun-apologists. They'll seek ANY rationale to keep and get more damn guns.
calimary
Oct 2014
#126
I do not think so, because guns are everything but killing machines and when they do kill..
Tikki
Oct 2014
#34
well here is one suggestion posted on my high school graduating classes Facebook page
Douglas Carpenter
Oct 2014
#61
Actually do something? You mean more than bitch on the internet? LOL, no. Don't be stupid.
flvegan
Oct 2014
#65
Federal government is good at some things, bad at others. Federal government can be slow,
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2014
#68
Children, even in High School, feared reprisal from their parents if they were caught messing...
Tikki
Oct 2014
#103
Truly. These people parading around openly wearing their massacre machines are public menaces.
calimary
Oct 2014
#127
True, and I live in one of those states that have hot, dry summers, average temp-110
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#164
There is no solution to prevent a lone nut with a gun. Too many guns and too easy to obtain. nt
Logical
Oct 2014
#105
It wouldn't even do that-- the right would be protected by the 9th, federally. ;) n/t
X_Digger
Oct 2014
#208
Those semi autos back then were cheaper to buy than today relative to the level of wages.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#171
The mid to late 70's is considered the second most violent period for school shootings
hack89
Oct 2014
#174
Which is odd, because shootings in schools were much more common in the 1970s than today
Recursion
Oct 2014
#215
The sad reality is that any serious anti gun legislation would drive gun sales through the roof.
Initech
Oct 2014
#172
I would like to see a fraction of the concern for 1 ebola death directed at gun violence.
Vinca
Oct 2014
#177