Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
26. In the interest of accuracy, let's be clear that there were only two short periods in 2009-2010
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:23 PM
Oct 2014

in which Democrats, and the 2 Independents who caucused with them, held 60 seats:

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/did-the-democrats-ever-really-have-60-votes-in-the-senate-and-for-how-long/

Did The Democrats Ever Really Have 60 Votes In The Senate, And For How Long?

Doug Mataconis · Sunday, June 17, 2012

<snip>

Of course, as we all know too well, having majority control of both house of Congress doesn’t necessarily mean much if the opposition in the Senate decides to filibuster your legislation, and without a consistent caucus of 60 votes to overcome a cloture vote, legislation can be effectively blocked.

That leads to the question of how long the Democrats actually had a filibuster proof majority in the 111th Congress. As this chart from Wikipedia reveals, it wasn’t for a very long period of time at all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress#Senate

What this shows is is that there were only two time periods during the 111th Congress when the Democrats had a 60 seat majority:
■From July 7. 2009 (when Al Franken was officially seated as the Senator from Minnesota after the last of Norm Coleman’s challenges came to an end) to August 25, 2009 (when Ted Kennedy died, although Kennedy’s illness had kept him from voting for several weeks before that date at least); and
■From September 25, 2009 (when Paul Kirk was appointed to replace Kennedy) to February 4, 2010 (when Scott Brown took office after defeating Martha Coakley);
■For one day in September 2009, Republicans lacked 40 votes due to the resignation of Mel Martinez, who was replaced the next day by George LeMieux


So, to the extent there was a filibuster proof majority in the Senate it lasted during two brief periods which lasted for a total of just over five months when counted altogether (and Congress was in its traditional summer recess for most of the July-August 2009 time frame).


Also remember that one of those two Independents who caucused with the Democrats was Joe Lieberman, who went his own way when it suited him and could not be relied on.
I appreciate your post. It is about much more than the Obama Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #1
Thanks. We really need to be looking to the future MineralMan Oct 2014 #2
Of course, it's about more than President Obama. But you wouldn't know that from the kelliekat44 Oct 2014 #3
THIS. ^^^^ calimary Oct 2014 #29
Wan't aware Obama was on a 2014 ballot Scootaloo Oct 2014 #4
He's not, which is at the core of my point. MineralMan Oct 2014 #5
But it makes your point a straw man Scootaloo Oct 2014 #7
But but but...look at all the anti-Obama threads on page 1 of GD! Rex Oct 2014 #11
Voting is good. Yes, good. Autumn Oct 2014 #12
LOL! Rex Oct 2014 #19
Not sure what to make of DU'ers who trash GOTV threads emulatorloo Oct 2014 #37
Funny. It was a light-hearted GOTV post. MineralMan Oct 2014 #44
This is an election of senate members, the votes are needed by Obama Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #9
Then you should be more concerned with so many of them trying to distance themselves from the guy Scootaloo Oct 2014 #10
No, not concerned in the least. Thinkingabout Oct 2014 #13
Yeah we can't wait to vote for David Duke. Biggest crock of bullshit I've read on DU emulatorloo Oct 2014 #56
He was unable to get things accomplished with 60 senators in 09-10 Doctor_J Oct 2014 #17
In the interest of accuracy, let's be clear that there were only two short periods in 2009-2010 scarletwoman Oct 2014 #26
pesky facts. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2014 #39
Don't confuse him with the facts emulatorloo Oct 2014 #40
ok, 58 or whatever. regardless, next year won't be as favorable. Doctor_J Oct 2014 #46
Huh? Of course I don't "think voting this year is going to ring in the dawn of FDR II" - where scarletwoman Oct 2014 #48
Might as well stay home ... yup. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #27
can you link to a post at du where someone Doctor_J Oct 2014 #47
You just said nothing's going to happen anyway. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #57
"But I did not literally say that!" emulatorloo Oct 2014 #58
He also "forgets" the CommonDreams article folks posted here ... JoePhilly Oct 2014 #59
I can think of one more Andy823 Oct 2014 #63
could be. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #66
Uh-huh. OK, then... MineralMan Oct 2014 #45
Obama - I'm not on ballot “But make no mistake, these policies are on the ballot" maced666 Oct 2014 #42
K&R Mister Nightowl Oct 2014 #6
Imma... GummyBearz Oct 2014 #8
wtf mopinko Oct 2014 #64
Obama rocks coldean Oct 2014 #14
"Obama's severely left socialist views" blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #15
"...his severely left socialist views" Uh, sure... scarletwoman Oct 2014 #16
can you give us an example of one of his socialist views? Doctor_J Oct 2014 #18
Let's face it, Obama won both times because he rocks. Rex Oct 2014 #20
"democrat" president? Socialist? deurbano Oct 2014 #21
He got re-elected and bush was not running...Obama and is managers movonne Oct 2014 #22
If you intend to continue posting here you might learn to say "democratic" president. I know it can rhett o rick Oct 2014 #25
Thanks, I missed that one... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2014 #36
(whatever you smoked in the '70s must've been REALLY GOOD..........) lastlib Oct 2014 #28
"Severely socialist views" -- Are you kidding? whathehell Oct 2014 #30
"severely left socialist views" Ha, ha, you've been sleeping in class. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #34
Way to damn with faint praise! MineralMan Oct 2014 #43
"democrat president" Skittles Oct 2014 #53
keep reading genuis coldean Oct 2014 #54
WTF Skittles Oct 2014 #67
'severely left socialist views'...posting drunk so early in the day? seek help spanone Oct 2014 #62
President Obama has no severely left socialist views. None, zero. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #65
Go to - pleasecuththecrap Docross Oct 2014 #23
Here's your link again, this one takes you to the page.. mountain grammy Oct 2014 #35
K&R because we need a working legislature and Skidmore Oct 2014 #24
Voted today here in NC , straight Dem ticket as always..... bowens43 Oct 2014 #31
please accept my apology coldean Oct 2014 #32
Welcome to DU. (We're a little sensitive around here sometimes, hence the sarcasm smiley... Stardust Oct 2014 #33
I appreciate your understanding coldean Oct 2014 #38
A democrat would know that awoke_in_2003 Oct 2014 #41
I've been a Dem all my life, but it wasn't until DU that I became aware of the snide distinction. Stardust Oct 2014 #49
"I've been a Dem all my life, but it wasn't until DU that I became aware of the snide distinction." coldean Oct 2014 #51
Yup. I probably heard it used many times without realizing it was a slur. Here's a link for an Stardust Oct 2014 #52
You caught me.. coldean Oct 2014 #50
Just to be clear... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2014 #55
They'll never finish IronLionZion Oct 2014 #60
Winner, Best DU Kanye Allusion! WinkyDink Oct 2014 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Know Some of You Don't ...»Reply #26