Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
4. A hugely important post. Back in August 2013, David Graeber published a very
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 11:41 PM
Oct 2014

interesting essay called 'Bullshit Jobs'. In it, Graeber noted the phenomeonon that those professions that do the most for people, like nursing, teaching and childcare, receive the lowest compensation, while professions and jobs that do very little for the human race, like finance, receive the highest compensation. I hope you get a chance to read Graeber's essay.

In the year 1930, John Maynard Keynes predicted that, by century’s end, technology would have advanced sufficiently that countries like Great Britain or the United States would have achieved a 15-hour work week. There’s every reason to believe he was right. In technological terms, we are quite capable of this. And yet it didn’t happen. Instead, technology has been marshaled, if anything, to figure out ways to make us all work more. In order to achieve this, jobs have had to be created that are, effectively, pointless. Huge swathes of people, in Europe and North America in particular, spend their entire working lives performing tasks they secretly believe do not really need to be performed. The moral and spiritual damage that comes from this situation is profound. It is a scar across our collective soul. Yet virtually no one talks about it.

Why did Keynes’ promised utopia – still being eagerly awaited in the ‘60s – never materialise? The standard line today is that he didn’t figure in the massive increase in consumerism. Given the choice between less hours and more toys and pleasures, we’ve collectively chosen the latter. This presents a nice morality tale, but even a moment’s reflection shows it can’t really be true. Yes, we have witnessed the creation of an endless variety of new jobs and industries since the ‘20s, but very few have anything to do with the production and distribution of sushi, iPhones, or fancy sneakers.

So what are these new jobs, precisely? A recent report comparing employment in the US between 1910 and 2000 gives us a clear picture (and I note, one pretty much exactly echoed in the UK). Over the course of the last century, the number of workers employed as domestic servants, in industry, and in the farm sector has collapsed dramatically. At the same time, “professional, managerial, clerical, sales, and service workers” tripled, growing “from one-quarter to three-quarters of total employment.” In other words, productive jobs have, just as predicted, been largely automated away (even if you count industrial workers globally, including the toiling masses in India and China, such workers are still not nearly so large a percentage of the world population as they used to be).

But rather than allowing a massive reduction of working hours to free the world’s population to pursue their own projects, pleasures, visions, and ideas, we have seen the ballooning not even so much of the “service” sector as of the administrative sector, up to and including the creation of whole new industries like financial services or telemarketing, or the unprecedented expansion of sectors like corporate law, academic and health administration, human resources, and public relations. And these numbers do not even reflect on all those people whose job is to provide administrative, technical, or security support for these industries, or for that matter the whole host of ancillary industries (dog-washers, all-night pizza deliverymen) that only exist because everyone else is spending so much of their time working in all the other ones.


http://strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You're not being too critical Prophet 451 Oct 2014 #1
Thank the people who are corporations sending their huge profits off-shore and hoarding the rest. n kelliekat44 Oct 2014 #2
That's a big part of it Prophet 451 Oct 2014 #3
A hugely important post. Back in August 2013, David Graeber published a very KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #4
"I am curious if I am too critical" < You funny. n/t jtuck004 Oct 2014 #5
I've been in the work force since my first job in 1968 (high school) MrMickeysMom Oct 2014 #6
You have it just about right, you may be required to take tests, go back for 3 or 4 interviews whereisjustice Oct 2014 #7
this is a recipe on how not to get any job above the most menial whatthehey Oct 2014 #18
I Had An Interview RobinA Oct 2014 #22
I'm not talking about senior level six figure positions here, if you want in the door whereisjustice Oct 2014 #25
Your suggestions sound like a great way not to get hired. MineralMan Oct 2014 #19
You have just tipped your hand as being far, far out of touch with reality whereisjustice Oct 2014 #24
Sadly, you are correct leftieNanner Oct 2014 #8
Better than borrowing, just sell some stock to tide you over through closeupready Oct 2014 #21
Everything going according to plan. And no real "Opposition Party" to stop it. blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #9
You're right shenmue Oct 2014 #10
Malthus and unemployment... HoosierCowboy Oct 2014 #11
"...lead to social disorder." Jesus, I hope so. And soon. Eleanors38 Oct 2014 #28
I find the panel interviews particularly disgusting BuelahWitch Oct 2014 #12
Too critical? Not critical enough in my book. blur256 Oct 2014 #13
Sadly The trend I Mention Started With Reagan. It Was A Slow Start But Accelerated Though Time TheMastersNemesis Oct 2014 #15
I agree. It's very bad. I know a many people who are dealing with this. C Moon Oct 2014 #14
I've been interviewed many times, including by many panels whatthehey Oct 2014 #16
I find interviews to be like root canals hfojvt Oct 2014 #31
Interviews are no fun. MissB Oct 2014 #17
It depends on a lot of different things. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #20
The Internet has changed the way companies hire people Calista241 Oct 2014 #23
This nicely sums it up whereisjustice Oct 2014 #26
Monty Python nailed job interviews Art_from_Ark Oct 2014 #27
The corporate state is in place. There is no opposition. Eleanors38 Oct 2014 #29
OT, but when I see your screen name... hlthe2b Oct 2014 #32
Hah! She better not tangle with MY Eleanor! Eleanors38 Oct 2014 #33
I found it to be that way all through the 90s hfojvt Oct 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Full Time Life Sustaining...»Reply #4