General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the American left not as effective as the European left? [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself, therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-George Bernard Shaw
1. Self-absorbed and insular, waiting for the country to come to it rather than acting as bold missionaries for its values.
Oliver T Leftist: "Please sir, we want some more."
True Blue Door: "More? You want more? How DARE You?"
2. Flighty and abstract, obsessing on symbols and feelings while treating objective judgment and logic as profane.
Symbols like the 10 Commandments on the County Courthouse square, eh?
Anyone who is not a Christian should just grin and bear it for the cause, no?
3. A negative self-definition that unjustly concedes the moral substance of American culture to false right-wing definitions.
The left has been fighting a rear-guard action since the treason of Reagan in Iran, now you want to bash them for being on the defensive?
Hello, does the term "Reagan Democrats" have meaning for you?
4. Rewards dereliction by political leaders who fill the void of accomplishment with ineffectual symbolic advocacy.
No grunt ever went to war for a higher living standard, if symbols didn't mean anything the military wouldn't spend a considerable sum on band units for parades. Maybe part of the problem with the centrists is they don't understand the vital nature of symbols as a glue that holds a group of any sort together.
5. Punishes leaders who produce tangible achievements by obsessing on flaws as measured against nonexistent fantasy programs rather than against the preceding state of affairs.
Once again the vile calumny that the left stayed home in 2010.
6. Virtually ignores Congress - the most effectual branch of government to control - in favor of obsessing on the Executive Branch.
Assumes facts not in evidence, Congress gets discussed constantly on DU.
7. Instinctively prefers the personal freedom of being inconsequential over the moral dangers of governing effectively.
Moral dangers of governing effectively?
What does that even mean?