Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
6. The real problem...
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 02:42 PM
Oct 2014

...is that retailers are getting tired of dealing with the Silicon Valley's utter inability to design a common, effective payment system. Paypal, ApplePay, Google Wallet, Softcard, Amazon Payments, and about half a dozen startups are now competing for space and support on POS terminals. Retailers, on the other hand, have been saying for MANY years that they simply want one technology that works for everyone, so they can keep things (and costs) as low as possible. They thought they had a solution with Paypal, but the decline of Ebay's soon to be spun-off payment system left many retailers holding the bag and swallowing millions of dollars in losses over wasted implementation costs. Home Depot, as one example, spent millions implementing and deploying Paypal support to all of its retail locations, but actual sales using the system have been abysmal, and they supposedly have not even recovered the original implementation costs yet. The retailers are getting burned, and are no longer interested in supporting fad technologies.

What many of the tech companies have utterly failed to realize is that "the customer is always right", and the customer, in this case, is the RETAILERS, and not the people who are buying and using their mobile phones or downloading their apps. You can design the best consumer payment system in the world, but if the retailers won't spend the money to implement it (and widescale POS upgrades in retail chains can cost tens of millions of dollars...or more, in the biggest retailers), then the tech isn't going anywhere. The stores have been demanding "universal, cheap, and fast", and Silicon Valley has responded by fragmenting further and demanding that the retailers support ever more complicated payment systems and expensive hardware. They wanted the ability to integrate payments with their own apps, and were utterly ignored by the tech companies. They wanted the ability to tie payments into their customer loyalty programs and to link in payments via gift cards or store branded credit cards (which pass along lower...or no...fees to the retailer), and the tech companies weren't interested.

MCX launched the CurrentC project (backed by a huge list of retailers) because the retailers are tired of waiting for the techies to get their act together and offer a product that fit their demands. What the Silicon Valley inventors failed to realize is that multi-billion dollar corporations aren't retail consumers, and aren't going to patiently wait around while the techies try to figure out how to put an effective system together. They aren't going to implement a dozen iterations of various fad technologies while the Valley tried to figure out which one to standardize on. The retailers, with their deep pockets and total control of the POS terminals, have simply decided to cut the techies out of the loop and come up with their own solution. It's hard to fault the retailers for that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dear apple lovers: it's called "free market competition" nt msongs Oct 2014 #1
Keeping Apple from competing is free market competition? DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2014 #8
+1 Agschmid Oct 2014 #11
Apple is not being kept from competing. nt. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #12
Am I reading this wrong? Action_Patrol Oct 2014 #14
^^THIS^^ Atman Oct 2014 #16
Another vendor is offering a service that will save more money. NCTraveler Oct 2014 #25
You're being daft. Action_Patrol Oct 2014 #31
A group of businesses colluding to stop something isn't "free market competition" FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #13
That doesn't mean what you think it means. Action_Patrol Oct 2014 #15
I am going to take a wild guess that these large retailers Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #2
Not exactly Xithras Oct 2014 #7
Cash is looking better with each new tech. development. canoeist52 Oct 2014 #3
Exactly! arcane1 Oct 2014 #4
yep. no worries about security breaches. littlewolf Oct 2014 #5
We are doing this more and more JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #26
The real problem... Xithras Oct 2014 #6
CurrentC is dead on arrival too, Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2014 #21
That's more marketing than anything. Xithras Oct 2014 #23
Consumers fear overdrafts more than credit card security breaches Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2014 #24
I don't see why I can't just use the Clipper card I use on transit KamaAina Oct 2014 #22
If I'm running a business, I wouldn't limit how my customers want to pay me. FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #9
If you own a small business you can go quite crazy SheilaT Oct 2014 #28
Limiting options isnt always bad for business. Travis_0004 Oct 2014 #32
Wow that sounds clunky & unsafe. Good luck, Walmart. DirkGently Oct 2014 #10
Here's what's really happening... brooklynite Oct 2014 #17
In this case, good... I really don't want Apple controlling payments with more of their JCMach1 Oct 2014 #18
You do realize that Android phones have NFC capability too FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #19
Seems like that's not going to happen anyway since the payment universe is set to remain fragmented. JCMach1 Oct 2014 #33
Japan has had a secure system like Apple Pay since 2004. Kablooie Oct 2014 #20
"Most of Europe has had it for years too. America is usually the last to adopt new technologies even pampango Oct 2014 #30
I Heard Something Over The Week-End That The New Apple 6 ChiciB1 Oct 2014 #27
Cash is almost always accepted everywhere. SheilaT Oct 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Big Retailer's New Clunky...»Reply #6