General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why can't these health care workers who've been exposed to Ebola just wait 21 days? [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,793 posts)As to those working with someone with Ebola - the number should be limited to as few individuals as possible - and during the shifts when they are working with an Ebola patient they should not be assigned to work with any other patients, and there should be sterilizing facilities that they leave through at the end of each shift to make sure they do not carry the virus out of the hospital on their skin or clothing.
After their last contact with the patient with Ebola, they should begin the 21 day supervised monitoring period. At the first sign of any symptoms (including fatigue) they should self-quarantine - which should be externally enforced if they are not cooperative. If they fail to self-monitor (by not reporting daily temp & symptoms - or by not being able to be located by people doing spot checks. That is now Nigeria went from being a country with Ebola, to being declared Ebola free.
Rather than addressing the serious concerns and reasonable suggestions which balance public health risks against unreasonable restrictions - restrictions imposed in a country which has successfully transitioned from having Ebola to one which no longer does, you (and many others) are dismissing the reality that scientists and doctors do not make the absolute assertions you are making about there being zero risk during the periods when 2 of the 3 diagnosed health care workers first started experiencing symptoms later confirmed to be the beginning of Ebola.
There is a risk, and in addressing it we need to respect the reality that Ebola has a greater than 50% fatality rate, and is not like any other disease we have previously encountered.