General Discussion

karynnj

(60,949 posts)

15. Excellent and moving response

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:41 AM

Apr 2012

I can't begin to imagine how hard that time was for you. I can't imagine losing 60 people I knew - most likely just beginning their adult lives. Thank you for your service.

It is sad that the point that anyone with any honesty knew true - that Bush avoided Vietnam by pulling strings should NEVER have been in question. That he obviously did not do that job as required was almost beyond the point in 2004 - it should have sunk him in 2000 - but as a sitting President his disreputable actions in his youth were no longer the issue.

What hurts the most is that this was manipulated to vindicate Bush and to make it impossible to raise the character issue.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Was Dan Rather Right? Interesting [View all] mfcorey1 Apr 2012 OP

Yes, Rather was indeed right, MadHound Apr 2012 #1

Exactly. And GE had purchased CBS and media consolidation went wild under Powell. freshwest Apr 2012 #25

Not correct RockaFowler Apr 2012 #29

Thanks. Was Dan Rather right? freshwest Apr 2012 #30

Yes, Dan Rather was right. baldguy Apr 2012 #2

Yes, Rather was right pinboy3niner Apr 2012 #3

Excellent and moving response karynnj Apr 2012 #15

I'd recommend this post a million times if I could! calimary Apr 2012 #24

Oh, yeah--and here's a fuckin' clue for GWB... pinboy3niner Apr 2012 #4

Yes and he was punished for telling the truth. liberal N proud Apr 2012 #5

Yes, Dan Rather was right Cirque du So-What Apr 2012 #6

the troops were probably better off wendylaroux Apr 2012 #7

F-102 crews did nothing except sit alert on runways at TSNAB waiting for North Vietnam bombers leveymg Apr 2012 #12

Interesting bongbong Apr 2012 #18

F-102 had only 3 real combat losses in VN as opposed to 382 F-4s shot down. leveymg Apr 2012 #21

The answer is yes. He was right lunatica Apr 2012 #8

I have been trying to get this link to load all morning with no luck...could the site be down? sunwyn Apr 2012 #9

It's probably overloaded with people trying to get on it. bluethruandthru Apr 2012 #10

I read the first page Oilwellian Apr 2012 #17

Right on the story, but got scammed by Rove on the documents. Should have made the scam the story leveymg Apr 2012 #11

+1 Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #14

I agree! Overseas Apr 2012 #16

+1 hughee99 Apr 2012 #26

The secretary who produced the original document and who confirmed that wiggs Apr 2012 #31

CBS corporate allowed the other side to set the narrative. Rather was sacrificed by the suits. leveymg Apr 2012 #32

K and R panader0 Apr 2012 #13

R#22 for, why is there a question mark about Dan being right?!1 UTUSN Apr 2012 #19

k&r... spanone Apr 2012 #20

A long read but well worth it. GardeningGal Apr 2012 #22

I always thought Rather was right... kentuck Apr 2012 #23

I never doubted that Rather was correct. n/t NRaleighLiberal Apr 2012 #27

Must make sure this report makes it into Bush lie-brary. crunch60 Apr 2012 #28