General Discussion

mulsh

(2,959 posts)

8. "Certainly not with the attention it's received." Not the same as

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 10:01 AM

Apr 2012

'No, I wouldn't". No remorse or empathy for the dog.

this implies that the only reason he wouldn't do it again is due to the negative response some one must have told him about.

Both he and that wife have now given answers in the same interview that confirm what I suspect; they're run of the mill sociopaths. Certainly they're not the sort of people I want in positions of relative authority.

Neither of them have ever made one statement demostrating remorse or showing empathy for the dog. this speaks volumes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mitt Romney answers THE Question: NO, I Wouldn't Put Dog On The Roof Again [View all] kpete Apr 2012 OP

But would he Bar-B-Que one again??? newfie11 Apr 2012 #1

Same 'ol, 'Im running for Office for pete's sake' denem Apr 2012 #2

Mitt shows his asshole nature: Not because it is wrong, but because it gandered negative attention FSogol Apr 2012 #3

Typical Romney answer worried about attention and perception not if it is right or wrong! gordianot Apr 2012 #4

"Certainly not with the attention it's received. " madokie Apr 2012 #5

Of course not, he would probably put it under the tires. Autumn Apr 2012 #6

So if it weren't going to get attention, yes he'd do it again. Bake Apr 2012 #7

"Certainly not with the attention it's received." Not the same as mulsh Apr 2012 #8

Seamus did his job NJCher Apr 2012 #9

so, he would do it if it received no attention.... spanone Apr 2012 #10