General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Inside Story of Matt Taibbi's Departure From First Look Media [View all]Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)Part of what we do here is write about the media and theres nothing more inside baseball than writing about the media. There are more jokes than I can count that involve journalists breathlessly detailing the comings and goings of other journalists as if any of it really matters, because the truth is were an arrogant bunch who believe our business is so damn fascinating that others should not only be required to know about it but will actually enjoy the experience. I thought about this a lot yesterday as everyone here, myself included, freaked out at the news that Glenn Greenwald and the rest of the Intercept all-stars were effectively throwing Matt Taibbi under the bus then backing over him a few times.
There are admittedly some soap opera-like twists and turns to the story that almost anyone can appreciate, though. At least I think. In addition to the undeniable fact that what happened yesterday makes it look like First Look Media which youll remember was supposed to be this new, non-hierarchical model of utopian journalism is a fucking mess inside and out, its really something to see an ostensible news operation issue whats basically a press release trashing a former colleague (and doing it under the guise of simply being transparent). The fact that this press release also steps right up to the precipice of insulting the founder of First Look and the man holding the purse strings, Pierre Omidyar, while being careful not to cross that line is also noteworthy. What the Intercept crew did may have called out Omidyar a little, but not enough to get them in any kind of real trouble. In fact, by going only as far as they did, Greenwald & Co. get to shore up their independent bona fides while not actually putting their jobs in any kind of jeopardy.
The same, of course, cant be said for Alex Pareene, who in defending his friend and former coworker from the Intercept attack just came right out and went full scorched earth on First Look, saying that its management stepped in to fuck things up just as they were coming to a solution to all this nonsense involving Taibbi. Pareene by the way disputes most of the allegations made by The Intercept regarding Matt Taibbis supposedly abrasive dealings with his staff, up to and including the publications potentially actionable claim that Taibbi worked over one of his underlings because she was a woman. Pareene, probably understandably at this point, is either so frustrated or so over it all that hes willing to torch his bridges at First Look. If I were him Id position myself with Taibbi wherever he goes next, because right now thats a hell of a better connection to have than being attached to First Look, which feels more than ever like a plane going down.
That First Look is having these kinds of problems shouldnt surprise anyone. From the very beginning its model was complete pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking. You cant reinvent decades of journalistic process just because it sounds good to say it out loud and it makes you feel like youre sticking your thumb in the eye of the establishment when you do. You also cant have an organization that has no actual leaders, where everyone is essentially at the same level. Thats a wonderfully Garden-of-Eden-like fantasy but thats about all it is. And again, anyone who believed that Omidyar wasnt going to exert control and begin moving the goalposts once it became apparent that, as Bob Cesca put it yesterday on the podcast I do with him, he couldnt herd the cats hed brought in, that person is completely oblivious to reality...
Read more at http://thedailybanter.com/2014/10/giant-ridiculous-soap-opera-matt-taibbis-departure-first-look-media/#ptcW02VvqofLyR3H.99
(I need to do a victory lap somewhere)