General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Saez & Piketty--Why the 1% should pay tax at 80% [View all]that simply does NOT fit the facts. Here are some facts
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/169
See how the effective rate for the top 0.1% went down from 2000 to 2008? Was that because the Bush tax cuts created more loopholes? Or was it because the Bush tax cuts lowered the rates?
What about 1986 to 2008 for the top 1%. Dropped from 33.13% to 23.25% because Reagan lowered rates. Went up by 1995, because Clinton raised rates. Went down again after 1995 because Clinton lowered rates (especially on capital gains). Went down again after 2000, because Bush lowered rates.
Yeah sure, rates don't affect those rich people at all.
How do you know so much about Mitt's tax rates? Did he ever release more than two years worth of returns? Google tells me only two years, so you would seem to have a claim - about Mitt's taxes, that you cannot verify.