General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was shocked comparing my wife's 401K to my [View all]GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)It is mainly the companies fault. But I AM still paying for the companies pension short fall by getting lower (below inflation rate) raises, giving up my own pension (note, I am vested at a 5 year mark which is nearly nothing compared to what being vested at a 45 year mark is, as you should well know, the benefits ramp up exponentially at the end of one's working tenure).
So now, 10 years into it, I have a defined benefit plan that credits me for 5 years of work service, regardless of whether or not I work there for the next 35 years.
So back to the OP, which had the premise that defined benefit plans are so much better for workers than 401k's. In my experience, it is the exact opposite. Defined benefit plans suck balls as they can be severely stripped down at any moment by the company. Where as my 401k (thus far) has not been taken away from me.