General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘God is not a magician’: Pope says Christians should believe in evolution and Big Bang [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Science is based upon evidence, and if new evidence comes in that forces a re-evaluation of the current maps or descriptions of reality, the scientific method allows- actually insists upon- updating and revising the old faulty maps with new ones.
Religious dogma is the precise opposite- it involves having the answer first and then disregarding (or getting mad about) evidence that doesn't fit the preordained conclusion. Evolution by natural selection has ONLY been confirmed, repeatedly, by the incoming evidence.
I didn't "hear it here first"... people--- Theists, mostly- have been desperately looking for a way around the fact of evolution for over a century. It hasn't happened. I don't think it will. If it does, it will be science that answers that question, because that's what science does.
But stomping ones' feet or imagining that the truth isn't really the truth because one doesn't like the implications or the views of the guy who came up with the explanation... that aint science, mac.
When something is true, actually, verifiably, evidentiarily true, telling people that fact even though they don't want to hear it may seem the same as proselytizing some myth or fairy tale, but in actuality they are two totally different things.