Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT: "Cancel the Midterms". Do you agree? [View all]KansDem
(28,498 posts)8. Agree...
Two "corruptions" of late--
1. The so-called "voter-fraud epidemic." There never was an epidemic, so promoting voter-suppression tactics to stop it is a lie.
2. Corporate-owned voting machines with super-secret proprietary software. There have been repeated reports of vote flipping occurring in the last several elections (remember Karl Rove's surprise when he learned of Ohio's results in 2012?). It's time to return to paper ballots with publicly-witnessed counting.
These corruptions need to be addressed and stopped. Everything else is just noise...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Two years keeps congressional representatives tuned into what their constituents want.
badtoworse
Nov 2014
#2
The volatility is a good thing. The last thing we need is a system designed for ossification and the
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#5
If you 'cancel the midterms,' the 233 republican majority in the House stays in place until 2018!
BP2
Nov 2014
#10
Amend the Constitution and set the terms of Congress and President to four or six years, whichever.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2014
#12
In any parliamentary system, a small party can threaten to bring down the government,
Nye Bevan
Nov 2014
#20
Gridlock and very slow change were considered a feature, not a bug, in our system.
branford
Nov 2014
#28
If the President has to resort to repeated vetoes for the last two years of his Presidency, he ...
dawg
Nov 2014
#35
Well, it's all fun and games and checks and balances until we actually default on something.
dawg
Nov 2014
#41
I'm not sure that it's that "wacky". Two years is a very short term for congressmen.
Nye Bevan
Nov 2014
#23