Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Woman’s Lifetime Earnings Lost To Pay Gap Could Feed A Family Of Four For 37 Years [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)23. I'm sure you have an answer, and a source
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ph-sp/determinants/index-eng.php#key_determinants
Women, on average, have lower incomes and social status; suffer the stress associated with the double workload of women with families; are at hugely higher risk of injury and death at the hands of intimate partners; suffer more negative health effects from minority status.
Some of these are obviously associated with employment. Women may not work at "dangerous" jobs at the same rate as men do, but working (or being excluded from working by factors associated with sex) is dangerous to women's health in a number of ways.
If this is a competition ...
(edited; misplaced one of the information excerpts)
Determinants of Health
... Key Determinants
<click each at the page to see premises and evidence; I reproduce some salient points below>
Income and Social Status
Social Support Networks
Education and Literacy
Employment/Working Conditions
Social Environments
Physical Environments
Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills
Healthy Child Development
Biology and Genetic Endowment
Health Services
Gender
Culture
... Key Determinants
<click each at the page to see premises and evidence; I reproduce some salient points below>
Income and Social Status
Only 47% of Canadians in the lowest income bracket rate their health as very good or excellent, compared with 73% of Canadians in the highest income group.
Low-income Canadians are more likely to die earlier and to suffer more illnesses than Canadians with higher incomes, regardless of age, sex, race and place of residence.
At each rung up the income ladder, Canadians have less sickness, longer life expectancies and improved health.
Studies suggest that the distribution of income in a given society may be a more important determinant of health than the total amount of income earned by society members. Large gaps in income distribution lead to increases in social problems and poorer health among the population as a whole.
Low-income Canadians are more likely to die earlier and to suffer more illnesses than Canadians with higher incomes, regardless of age, sex, race and place of residence.
At each rung up the income ladder, Canadians have less sickness, longer life expectancies and improved health.
Studies suggest that the distribution of income in a given society may be a more important determinant of health than the total amount of income earned by society members. Large gaps in income distribution lead to increases in social problems and poorer health among the population as a whole.
Social Support Networks
Education and Literacy
Employment/Working Conditions
Employment has a significant effect on a person's physical, mental and social health. Paid work provides not only money, but also a sense of identity and purpose, social contacts and opportunities for personal growth. When a person loses these benefits, the results can be devastating to both the health of the individual and his or her family. Unemployed people have a reduced life expectancy and suffer significantly more health problems than people who have a job.
... Participation in the wage economy, however, is only part of the picture. Many Canadians (especially women) spend almost as many hours engaged in unpaid work, such as doing housework and caring for children or older relatives. When these two workloads are combined on an ongoing basis and little or no support is offered, an individual's level of stress and job satisfaction is bound to suffer. Between 1991 and 1995, the proportion of Canadian workers who were "very satisfied" with their work declined, and was more pronounced among female workers, dropping from 58% to 49%. Reported levels of work stress followed the same pattern. In the 199697 NPHS, more women reported high work stress levels than men in every age category. Women aged 20 to 24 were almost three times as likely to report high work stress than the average Canadian worker.
... Participation in the wage economy, however, is only part of the picture. Many Canadians (especially women) spend almost as many hours engaged in unpaid work, such as doing housework and caring for children or older relatives. When these two workloads are combined on an ongoing basis and little or no support is offered, an individual's level of stress and job satisfaction is bound to suffer. Between 1991 and 1995, the proportion of Canadian workers who were "very satisfied" with their work declined, and was more pronounced among female workers, dropping from 58% to 49%. Reported levels of work stress followed the same pattern. In the 199697 NPHS, more women reported high work stress levels than men in every age category. Women aged 20 to 24 were almost three times as likely to report high work stress than the average Canadian worker.
Social Environments
Family violence has a devastating effect on the health of women and children in both the short and long term. In 1996, family members were accused in 24% of all assaults against children; among very young children, the proportion was much higher.
Women who are assaulted often suffer severe physical and psychological health problems; some are even killed. In 1997, 80% of victims of spousal homicide were women, and another 19 women were killed by a boyfriend or ex-boyfriend.
Women who are assaulted often suffer severe physical and psychological health problems; some are even killed. In 1997, 80% of victims of spousal homicide were women, and another 19 women were killed by a boyfriend or ex-boyfriend.
Physical Environments
Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills
Healthy Child Development
Biology and Genetic Endowment
Health Services
Gender
Men are more likely to die prematurely than women, largely as a result of heart disease, fatal unintentional injuries, cancer and suicide. Rates of potential years of life lost before age 70 are almost twice as high for men than women and approximately three times as high among men aged 20 to 34.
While women live longer than men, they are more likely to suffer depression, stress overload (often due to efforts to balance work and family life), chronic conditions such as arthritis and allergies, and injuries and death resulting from family violence.
While overall cancer death rates for men have declined, they have remained persistently stubborn among women, mainly due to increases in lung cancer mortality. Teenage girls are now more likely than adolescent boys to smoke. If increased rates of smoking among young women are not reversed, lung cancer rates among women will continue to climb.
See also articles on Rural, remote and northern women - where you live matters to your health and How being Black and female affects your health
While women live longer than men, they are more likely to suffer depression, stress overload (often due to efforts to balance work and family life), chronic conditions such as arthritis and allergies, and injuries and death resulting from family violence.
While overall cancer death rates for men have declined, they have remained persistently stubborn among women, mainly due to increases in lung cancer mortality. Teenage girls are now more likely than adolescent boys to smoke. If increased rates of smoking among young women are not reversed, lung cancer rates among women will continue to climb.
See also articles on Rural, remote and northern women - where you live matters to your health and How being Black and female affects your health
Culture
Women, on average, have lower incomes and social status; suffer the stress associated with the double workload of women with families; are at hugely higher risk of injury and death at the hands of intimate partners; suffer more negative health effects from minority status.
Some of these are obviously associated with employment. Women may not work at "dangerous" jobs at the same rate as men do, but working (or being excluded from working by factors associated with sex) is dangerous to women's health in a number of ways.
If this is a competition ...
(edited; misplaced one of the information excerpts)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A Woman’s Lifetime Earnings Lost To Pay Gap Could Feed A Family Of Four For 37 Years [View all]
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
OP
Feel free to "trot" out the old debunking arguments... please. Please do so. nt
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#5
I am not going to lend credence to a report commissioned by the Bush Admin and done by a Rand Corp
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#13
Actually, most studies up to this Randian pretty much supported this stat.
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#70
Your own article doesn't support the stat, if you read it carefully. They blazon "77%," but read
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#79
It's not a rand spin-off, it's headed by a former rand employee. somewhat different.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#67
Doesn't matter what you believe, she says it was her choice and there's no particular reason
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#80
And women? I'm a female farmer - one of the most dangerous occupations on any list. nt
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#18
but men disproportionately perform the most dangerous jobs. that's just a fact.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#60
Mining, farming, fishing, roofing, pay more than comparably skilled safe jobs.
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2012
#37
Something wrong with this statistic. For most people, 37 years is about close to a lifetime's work
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#9
In 2010 women who worked full time, year round, still only earned 77 percent of what men earned
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#15
And the men that do the same job (I'm assuming nurses' aide) get the same lousy pay.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#65
Well, there is the rub. A traditional man's job (education and training) will command
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#68
and that's a question that "women only make 77% of what men do" does nothing to advance
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#69
Equal pay for equal work is already the law of the land, and so is non-discrimination in hiring.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#74
and that's where i disagree with you, when you put wage differences in job categories down to
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#73
"holding the same full-time, year-round job" is a misrepresentation, intentional or otherwise.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#81
I agree that nurses aides are underpaid for what they do. That said, they *did* chose to do it.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#93
I didn't say anything like that. They *do* need to feed families, and half of them do it on abysmal
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#21
The disparity between the bottom 20% and the top 20% is larger and has larger ramifications for
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#57
Yes, they're going to hire the woman, but it could just as easily be an h1b male or anyone else
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#78
Now that I read the entire article, I see how duplicitous it is. While trumpeting the lifetime
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#76
I didn't know there were wage gap deniers. And to find one on the DU of all places! nt
Liquorice
Apr 2012
#82