Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
1. The very bad sign for Clinton, however, were the dismal outcomes for Democratic women candidates
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:49 AM
Nov 2014

Specifically, Grimes, Hagan, and (to a lesser extent) Davis. Granted, each of these women faced very tough odds in Red states during what was obviously a pro-GOP sentiment election. But the idea - and it's an idea that has attached itself to Clinton's campaign scenarios - that women will come out and vote for women seems to be less than solid. Even Sheehan faced a tight race in New Hampshire. So, yes, I agree with the OP by and large. This was going to be a tough sale election for Dems either way. But there's a bit of a downside for Clinton when she and her people analyze the election from a gender angle.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Hillary Clinton won t...»Reply #1