Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Voter turnout among lowest on record for midterm election [View all]Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)56. so the 1st time was stupidity and the 2nd time by design?
not buying it.
Kids just don't believe their vote has an impact and they have no clue what the platform is, with their elected officials.
Their apathy has nothing to do with disappointment, it has everything to do with apathy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We get clobbered in the midterms and you think Iraq has nothing to do with it????
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#6
Then you missed the poll where voters were asked what were their most important issues.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#8
polls touted here was that a majority of Americans favored gun control measures
Sheepshank
Nov 2014
#61
LOL. The entire 2008 election was a referendum on Iraq. Perpetual war is killing us.
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#62
OR, voters were discouraged from voting by those telling them over and over again
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#63
or the apathy and therefore the lack of turn out, was a result of "they're all the same" rhetoric
Sheepshank
Nov 2014
#65
I took the trouble to look at the available stats so far. Clearly you did not. Again, congratulation
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#66
Well, that sounds simple enough. So why do you think voters were so unenthusiastic??
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#9
When the voters want change it's not wise to offer them "more of the same".
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2014
#17
I dunno, we had a person advocating statewide single-payer in Mass during the primaries, and just
Chathamization
Nov 2014
#19
No, but it's also not as simple as just having people with better positions. Because people also
Chathamization
Nov 2014
#24
Well, that's true. The other issue is we're going to be better off with 52 progressives in the
Chathamization
Nov 2014
#27
I actually worried that turnout wasnt record low which would be even worse news
randys1
Nov 2014
#28
That was my initial reaction (anger) last night. It quickly morphed into
KingCharlemagne
Nov 2014
#67
The American People see no reason to vote when both sides are corporate stooges.
Odin2005
Nov 2014
#68