Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
85. Forgive the analogy.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 10:17 AM
Nov 2014

In street racing, a vast majority of the people choose to go with flashy cars, loud engines and the rest. In other words, obviously speedy cars. There is another smaller genre though. They are called sleepers. These cars don't look fast, are painted to look as common and normal as possible. Everything that makes them fast is hidden away, where you can't see it. It's a surprise then to have a powerful Ford Mustang, and get blown away by a Buick Rivera. Sleepers come in all shapes and sizes, but the one thing that makes them the same is that they don't look fast, and they don't sound powerful.

I mentioned above that for a guy obsessed with speedy cars, it's a big shock to get beaten by one of those sleepers. It doesn't look fast, and it doesn't seem especially dangerous. That is the analogy I'm talking about in the title. Democrats expected the Republicans to do all the work for them, they expected the Republicans to lose and give the win to the Dems by default.

We expected outrage over the Texas Abortion law to win the election for us. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024828366

We said that people would be thrilled with the rapid response of the militarized police and how it showed the Government was on the job. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022742634

Outrage over Citizens United would drive the people to the polls. Outrage over Sandy Hook would doom the Republican Party. Come on Cali, how many times have you seen threads just like that on this board? How many times have we heard the pundits say it on the news? The Government shutdown. The Republicans were deeply unpopular. You and I both tried to warn people here, and we were pretty much universally ignored, belittled, accused of spreading FUD. Tinfoil hat smiles, hair on fire smiles, I've seen it all, and so have you.

So the Democrats rolled to the start line in one of those flashy brightly colored cars with a big motor and loud exhaust pipes. The Republicans rolled to the line in a beige Buick. The lights turned green, and the race was on, and the Buick went to the lead, and just stayed there. The Democrats didn't take the race seriously until it was too late. It was a week or two before the election when everyone looked around, saw the polls, and decided that they were all wrong. Well, they were wrong, but in favor of the Republicans, it was an even worse blowout than many of us feared.

Now, the owner of the flashy car with the loud engine wants to claim that the Buick cheated. He used Nitrous Oxide. He jumped the light. He's using special tires. All of this to cover up the fact that the flashy car didn't take the race serious having dismissed the car without even really considering the possibilities that are hidden below the surface. One party went into this assuming that the Republicans would be obliging and commit suicide. Despite how smart the Republicans have been playing the game for the last two years, many on our side continue to underestimate the determination of our opponents. We talked about Texas, and how the Republicans were really smart in setting up the law to look reasonable. We talked about Sandy Hook and the Gun Control debate many times.

What we saw was two parties. One taking it very seriously, and offering advice based upon focus groups and polling on how to win. The other just going along assuming that the car they were racing was really slow and would just lose.

The reason a Sleeper works is that people underestimate how fast it really is. The reason the Republicans won is because the Democrats underestimated them, believing them to actually be the ignorant idiotic mouth breathing morons that we portray them to be. Well, we have a choice. We can learn, or we can pretend. If we learn, we have a good chance in 2016. If we decide that it was all racism, then we will be doomed again in two years to have this very same discussion.

The Republicans are smart. They are playing to their strengths, and we ignored them. We assumed it was only a matter of time before they did another Real Rape or something else stupid. Instead it was our side making the stupid comments.

So where do we go from here? Do we start to respect our opponents, and learn that the Republicans want to win, and are going to try to win? Or do we just sit back and wait for them to do something stupid so we don't have to work for it? While I hope we go with the former, I am seeing the signs we are going with the latter. We're going to sit on our asses and just obstruct, obstruct, and obstruct some more. This way, we can lose even bigger in 2016 because the Democratic brand will be so damaged we would lose to Tickle me Elmo.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As you note in the last lines, his deep unpopularity was not helpful. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #1
I never get the excuses and denial that invariably pop up after we lose cali Nov 2014 #2
It's simply being human. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #5
It isn't usually "excuses" FBaggins Nov 2014 #18
I don't either. Tatiana Nov 2014 #50
Yes, it was a pummeling by proxy. Can't do anything about the guy in the WH, so TwilightGardener Nov 2014 #36
i'll kick & rec that! spanone Nov 2014 #3
having the choice of repub or repub-lite is not a good motivator for turnout corkhead Nov 2014 #4
Seriously? Not this old saw again. In some states all they want is republican cali Nov 2014 #6
ask the disinterested voter why they are disinterested and they will tell you why they stayed home corkhead Nov 2014 #13
If that's true, then we shouldn't even bother running candidates in those states. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #38
But liberal candidates in many regions can't make it past the primaries. Kaleva Nov 2014 #45
Which is why we need open primaries. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #47
Yet the liberal policies win. Which is what confuses me. AleksS Nov 2014 #53
Yes! it is not just one issue but a number of them. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #7
right. many more than I listed, and some are very, very local cali Nov 2014 #14
Our losing Dem gov candidate Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #49
You hit the nail on the head with the economy. amandabeech Nov 2014 #8
But the Bankers have done extremely well since then. Bandit Nov 2014 #61
I can't figure it out, either. n/t amandabeech Nov 2014 #73
Me either...and I sure am shaking my head over Tuesday. nt mariawr Nov 2014 #79
Truly, would this be happening if Pres Obama were not Black? cilla4progress Nov 2014 #9
As I said, racism is a part. It's a significant piece in some places, but it's not the only cali Nov 2014 #15
LOL how did he get elected?! maced666 Nov 2014 #39
absolutely - many ran from bush, even Gore would not enlist Clinton support DrDan Nov 2014 #48
Do you remember the Clinton years? Bandit Nov 2014 #62
In 2006, votes ran away from Bush who was caucasion yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #82
The horrid attacks ads seemed to have worked in Arkansas. moriah Nov 2014 #10
My mom said the same thing Art_from_Ark Nov 2014 #83
"Let me be clear: It is delusional to claim dems lost because they didn't stand with the President" ProSense Nov 2014 #11
one more time: that is not the only reason. It's a factor; a significant one, but still one of cali Nov 2014 #16
"He did win two Presidential elections." ProSense Nov 2014 #22
true, but he did win Iowa. He certainly won MA and MD. cali Nov 2014 #24
Coakley was the Dem candidate for MA gov... wysi Nov 2014 #72
The Repubs elected 2 black legislators to Washington this year. Calista241 Nov 2014 #88
Sure, and that probably animated a bunch of voters... malthaussen Nov 2014 #17
I blame Ebola. malthaussen Nov 2014 #12
presidents get blamed for the bad stuff, get no credit for the good stuff. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #19
yes. every word is spot on. cali Nov 2014 #20
You are so right, and to pretend that dems lost because they didn't stand with the President Autumn Nov 2014 #21
thanks, Autumn. It's just pointing out the obvious. cali Nov 2014 #23
being clear does not equate to being right... lame54 Nov 2014 #25
baloney. the facts support my op. You have no facts to support you- or at least cali Nov 2014 #30
do you need facts... lame54 Nov 2014 #54
"Don't vote for Democrats ... except me!" is not a winning strategy. ieoeja Nov 2014 #26
Nunn/Carter in Georgia would have benefited if they stood with Obama, and.. Dawgs Nov 2014 #27
Nunn and Carter lost by over 8 points. Calista241 Nov 2014 #75
I didn't say she would have won. I said she would have benifitted. Dawgs Nov 2014 #77
A rash of Democratic retirements did not help either Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2014 #28
absolutely. cali Nov 2014 #31
agree. hell harkin couldn't stick it out for another 6 years. okieinpain Nov 2014 #32
They retired on a bad year Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2014 #57
it looks that way. hopefully president obama will do a good job okieinpain Nov 2014 #58
I'm going to disagree with you a little bit on president obama okieinpain Nov 2014 #29
doing that one on one is entirely a different thing. You don't have the MSM to contend with cali Nov 2014 #33
they did but not like the dems did with obama. n/t. okieinpain Nov 2014 #44
Standing with the President must include Darb Nov 2014 #34
This is it exactly. MoonchildCA Nov 2014 #52
It's hard to teach marions ghost Nov 2014 #66
Certainly true but when so many candidates run against the party's leader, even though it may make pampango Nov 2014 #35
I disagree. dawg Nov 2014 #37
I'm sure he is deeply unpopular in red states treestar Nov 2014 #40
No, the dems lost because they didn't stand with the President jeff47 Nov 2014 #41
You left Obama himself off the list - he needs to own some of it. maced666 Nov 2014 #42
It IS also a factor. When candidates won't even... JaneyVee Nov 2014 #43
An economy that does NOT benefit the vast majority of people bigwillq Nov 2014 #46
It's not necessarily standing with the Pres - it's running on the success. Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #51
Bingo Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2014 #64
I blame Snowden and Greenwald. Puzzledtraveller Nov 2014 #55
Plus quaking and stammering when adked about the leader of the party. Orsino Nov 2014 #56
All of the above and they ran away from the President. applegrove Nov 2014 #59
David Domina opposes Keystone, sent bankers to jail, and lost (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #60
If issues don't matter neither does the candidate.... nt think Nov 2014 #80
Agree, but also no unifed, consistent message, and it's always easier to campaign against joeybee12 Nov 2014 #63
Slightly disagree. Absent any other compelling rationale and narrative for election TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #65
You could not be more wrong Niko Nov 2014 #67
Um...NO...that is just one more factor, you seem to be the delusional one here. Rex Nov 2014 #68
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #69
Fuck you and your stupid post n/t arcane1 Nov 2014 #70
Don't enjoy your stay. Rex Nov 2014 #71
You forgot Chickenshit. GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #74
Two-way street. Combine the Conciliator-in-Chief with a party of spineless cowards BlueStreak Nov 2014 #76
voter turnout and apathy. Women and young for the most part didn't show up. It bothers me that GOTV still_one Nov 2014 #78
While all those factors are very real think Nov 2014 #81
Totally and respectively disagree. nilesobek Nov 2014 #84
Forgive the analogy. Savannahmann Nov 2014 #85
It sounds like you're feeling guilty. Renew Deal Nov 2014 #86
+1 rock Nov 2014 #87
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let me be clear: It is d...»Reply #85