General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How do we handle the thousands of "I wont Vote for Hillary" posts we are about to see? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)You answer, or fight (and that's what they want, a good old Democratic dust-up, a pissing contest that won't change anything, least of all the world), and they get their blood pumping (easier than exercise) and if you support HRC, you simply get annoyed.
Don't kick the thread, don't act on it, just make it go away. Let them stew in their little hate-Hill-fest, saying dumb ass shit about who won't show up to their post to "defend" her. In sum, let that kind of negativity just SINK. It will stand as a record of who whined that you can link to on Inauguration Day--if you want to be snarky.
Post a "Why I Will Vote For HRC If She Is The Nominee" treatise if you have a mind, or go kick a pro-HRC thread. Just don't give any loft to threads that are negative.
I'll work for any Democrat who gets the nomination, too. ANY Democrat. Even an Independent flying under the DEMOCRATIC PARTY banner. Why? Because the worst Democrat is miles better than the best Republican--and that's a fact.
Grayson won't get the nomination--he's been in the news lately for his acrimonious divorce and the details are Ugly, UGLY, UG-LEEEEEEE. He's toast. He will never go further than where he's at, and he'd better buckle down and make a good impression over the next two years or he may be vulnerable owing to "shenanigans." He's got so much to go after--his only saving grace is that he's in a safe district, but nothing would surprise me. The GOP could fund a DINO who flips after getting in.
That said, if lightning struck and he got the nomination, I'd work for him, too.
It's all about the Supreme Court, and if people have trouble grasping that, I feel sorry for them, because they just don't have very good powers of deduction, logic or reason.