Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ignore the 3rd Way shills with extreme prejudice [View all]wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)159. Frankly I'm shocked you posted the whole speech, seeing as he called "progressives" 'crackpots.'
Let's set it up:
Harry Truman is giving a speech to the Americans for Democratic Action, an organization led by Eleanor Roosevelt. Truman and (Eleanor) Roosevelt didn't always get along and sometime they'd butted heads on matters of policy and candidates. Eleanor was an early supporter of Henry Wallace, who ran against Truman in '48.
Truman took some small swipes at the ADA in this speech. First off was this:
there was a time when it might not have been so pleasant for me to meet with the ADA. I understand that 4 years ago-along about this time--some of the leaders of ADA were engaged in rather wild fancies about the Presidential nomination... You know, the peculiar part about it was that you were a young political organization and you had not studied the history of conventions. A President of the United States, when he desires and when he wants to be nominated, there isn't anybody in the world can keep him from being nominated.
Here, Truman was referencing the third party run of 'progressive' Henry Wallace and he was chiding them for supporting him. He was actually a little condescending, wasn't he? He essentially says, "It's understandable that you were stupid in '48. Your were inexperienced wannabes. We can all laugh about your 'wild fancies' about politics now."
He then sets the audience up for his famous "phony Democrat" quote:
In spite of the various notions about the nomination in 1948... the outcome of the election that year astonished a great many people. We astonished the pollsters and the sabotage press, and the opposition candidates--Republican, crackpot, and Dixiecrat.
Here, Truman calls out the 'progressive' movement by referring to Henry Wallace as a 'crackpot.' He also mentions the Dixiecrat (Strom Thurmond.) Two men who he rightly considered phony Democrats - a 'progressive' and a racist.
Now here comes the money quote:
When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the fair Deal, and says he really doesn't believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don't want a phony Democrat. The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.
You have to ask yourself who Truman was specifically referring to. Was it 'Democrats' who didn't believe in the New Deal? That's certainly what he said and it was directed at Strom Thurmond. But it might have just as well been directed at FDR himself who said this in his annual message to Congress in 1935:
A large proportion of these unemployed and their dependents have been forced on the relief rolls. The burden on the Federal Government has grown with great rapidity... The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fibre. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers.
The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.
The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.
Whew! Strong anti-welfare words from FDR himself.
Were Truman's words directed at 'Democrats' who weren't sufficiently 'progressive' overall as is claimed by people on DU and other places? There is NO indication of that whatsoever. Truman himself was accused by 'progressives' of the day for being too conservative (as was FDR, as a matter of fact.)
In '48, Truman made his feelings quite clear on the far left ("crackpots"
If we were to take Truman's quote and apply it to any time period beyond 1952, it would make just as much sense, perhaps more sense, to apply it to 'progressives.'
But let's say the quote IS about DLC/blue dogs/centrist, whatever. If it is, Truman was wrong. Those types of Dems have defeated "progressives" in countless primaries and Republicans in countless general elections. People did not, in fact, choose the Republican over them "every time."
History laughs everytime someone on DU pulls out the old Truman quote. He despised "progressives."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
264 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Especially with ant season now upon us and real ants also on my screen at times...
cascadiance
Nov 2014
#205
Well don't you dare blame it on your sprawling choice of one-and-a-quarter political parties!
villager
Nov 2014
#230
Third Way is a socially liberal moderate republican think tank that claims to be Democratic.
Zorra
Nov 2014
#12
Yes, their disdain for liberals and for protesters who oppose Right Wing, Wall St. policies gives
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#225
Explained like you have, 3rd way sounds exactly like Libertarians. Never thought of it that way.
Dont call me Shirley
Nov 2014
#54
Libertarians only believe in liberty for the rich, for everyone else it's authoritarianism.
Dont call me Shirley
Nov 2014
#227
Thank you. Third Way=Wall Street infiltration of the Democratic Party.
woo me with science
Nov 2014
#69
Socially liberal, once the liberal social issues are foregone conclusions, that is
Scootaloo
Nov 2014
#101
Socially liberal my ass, they aren't radical regressive is far as I'm willing to go.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2014
#161
They don't exist, is what you're saying?? Just want to understand your point. Simply calling
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#117
Good question 'why would a group of rich influence peddlers and bankers want to spend money
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#128
I know, and I thought DU was so powerful we were responsible for 'suppressing the vote'.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#136
Well like I said just 5 or 6 and they seem to not even know one thing about the Third Way
Rex
Nov 2014
#142
I miss Hannah Bell on threads like this. She could connect Bohemian Grove and the
msanthrope
Nov 2014
#143
Mm, 'the ramblings of a Paranoid Schizophrenic' and I am, according to you 'unhinged'.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#171
We are here, doing exactly as you propose. Apparently they don't like it very much.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#174
I just explained to you what Progressives were doing. They voted around the country for ISSUES
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#192
Here in Oregon where we had HIGH 70% vote by mail turnout, Dems and progressives were heard!
cascadiance
Nov 2014
#206
The website is of little concern, chemotherapy to remove them from control of the party is at issue.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2014
#165
They used to be called "Republicans," before that brand was de-valued by televangelists, gun nuts, &
Erose999
Nov 2014
#125
How well or poorly did Hillary's slate do last night? (By 'slate,' I mean the ones she
KingCharlemagne
Nov 2014
#16
Bernie Sanders' decision about whether to run in the Dem primaries or run
KingCharlemagne
Nov 2014
#22
It wouldn't have been impossible for Bernie and Elizabeth Warren to stump for Kay Hagan
treestar
Nov 2014
#177
I appreciate you going over the stats and look forward to seeing them posted.
WorseBeforeBetter
Nov 2014
#146
Thanks. I've mostly been reading the N&O, WRAL, WaPo and the Baltimore Sun...
WorseBeforeBetter
Nov 2014
#149
They've had it their way for 20 years and they've driven the party into the ground.
pa28
Nov 2014
#10
Agree, they seem to have incredible influence on banning posts though...
whereisjustice
Nov 2014
#17
So when are you going to run, Brent? Or are you suggesting we should cancel elections...
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#28
Planning a revolution with no plan is the hallmark of a 'prooogresssiiiveee' mind
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#61
I've not put forth anything. I've asked how the OP's radical change will be put forth.
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#75
So BrentSpeak is your fearless leader. The strong silent type. LOL. Good luck!
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#158
So stopping a non Democratic, right wing Republian entity from controlling the party leadership
AgingAmerican
Nov 2014
#189
"Shills" is exactly right! Until yesterday, I thought 3rd Way and DLC Democrats were just
hedgehog
Nov 2014
#31
I think in this case, "shill" is the operative noun rather than a pejorative -
hedgehog
Nov 2014
#46
it was easy to spot them since they didn't change their talking points from the Bush era
yurbud
Nov 2014
#50
Interestingly, 3rd-Wayers are to be purged from the Democratic Party; but, ...
1StrongBlackMan
Nov 2014
#87
Some people confuse standing up for rights of privacy from the NSA as being "Randian"...
cascadiance
Nov 2014
#207
What they do is push their failed ideology at all times, attack and mock liberals, exploit
TheKentuckian
Nov 2014
#169
Rats, that darn graphic again, all those nice investment bankers on Third Way Board of Trustees!
Zorra
Nov 2014
#124
Ironially, this line of argument is most prominent right before the actual elections.
JoePhilly
Nov 2014
#116
They know, pretending otherwise allows the dissemination of lame talking points so they just lie.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2014
#188
Frankly I'm shocked you posted the whole speech, seeing as he called "progressives" 'crackpots.'
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#159
'Progressive" attempts at rewriting history to fit their narrative is sad. And funny.
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#198
Whether it's Trumans' speech or my post to you, you clearly need work on reading for comprehension.
merrily
Nov 2014
#199
The president could help us there by not pushing for TPP to get passed or shut down Keystone...
cascadiance
Nov 2014
#208
I love how this keeps getting kicked as a "counter" to all of the really wonderful, positive news
Number23
Nov 2014
#213
in threads like this, a big portion of the replies are Limbaugh fan-like 'dittos.'
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#232
Absolutely. But it's always fun to watch the "left" ditto heads in action. They're the ones LOVING
Number23
Nov 2014
#234