Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

savalez

(3,517 posts)

1. Correct me if I'm wrong

Reply to n2doc (Original post)

Sat Nov 8, 2014, 02:31 PM

Nov 2014

but the SC didn't need to agree to take the case because it was going to be decided soon in another court and the whole thing would've ended right there with the courts deciding in favor of the ACA. Since it only takes 4 SC judges to accept a case then it's fair to assume that the same 4 judges that wanted to kill the ACA altogether are the ones that decided to take the case now. Correct? Is it that simple?