Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
32. Excellent post. Thank you, and this:
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 11:56 PM
Nov 2014
Our politicians shouldn't be leaders but should be led by us. is something some people seem to have no concept of, they ADORE and pay homage to people who are supposedly working for the people, only for a short time, and should never be viewed as 'friends who care about us' until we can look at the work they have done, assess it and decide whether or not the have done the job we hired them to do.

The glorification of politicians is a dangerous thing, it has a tendency to blind people to their own interests and mostly, the interests of the country.

And this:

That's the beauty of teamwork;adding then subtracting, adjusting and rewording, participating and pondering until thru our labor a child is born.


Yes, mature people working towards what is the best that can be achieved for the benefit of most, if not all of the people.

What we have now is 'you're rubber, I'm glue' level of political discourse, which I believe suits those who are not particularly interested in the Common Good, but more in their own profit margins.

What we have right now, isn't working for a vast majority of the people, that we know. So the question is, 'was it our fault because we allowed those whose own interests prefer things the way they are, to dictate how we talk to each other? I think definitely we all fell for the 'my team' 'your team' tactics and fostered the divisions that have ensured nothing is going to change until we stop being LED and start LEADING.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Supporting the racist/youth targeting drug war. bravenak Nov 2014 #1
Haven't you just failed most of the Democratic party? N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2014 #25
Yes. It is all my fault. I only voted once and got what I wanted through ballot measures. bravenak Nov 2014 #27
Yes, sadly that is probably true. So, what should be done about it? I definitely do not sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #31
well on the national level an open atheist is not electable - probably on the state level as well Douglas Carpenter Nov 2014 #2
Are you saying all politicians are phony if they need to be? kentuck Nov 2014 #15
phony might be too strong of a word - but people - not just politicians will frequently jump through Douglas Carpenter Nov 2014 #19
That's the nature of politics, I suppose... kentuck Nov 2014 #22
evolution aspirant Nov 2014 #28
Excellent post. Thank you, and this: sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #32
frankly, I think most professional Republican politicians whether elected officials or professional Douglas Carpenter Nov 2014 #33
That's an interesting observation. 'Career goal driven'. I'm not sure if that is true across the sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #35
our votes aspirant Nov 2014 #37
Yes, disqualified to all except their religion. JaneyVee Nov 2014 #3
... MrMickeysMom Nov 2014 #20
And if they are guilty of some of those things, but actually hold down an elected office, truedelphi Nov 2014 #4
There are a few disqualification positions, but it is more important every Dem support core values BlueStreak Nov 2014 #5
So... LP2K12 Nov 2014 #6
I'm not the author, but... Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #10
I don't see every single one of those as a disqualifier Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #7
A slight of hand aspirant Nov 2014 #44
I'll give it a shot BlindTiresias Nov 2014 #8
What's a passing grade? aquart Nov 2014 #9
K&R for excellent questions, kentuck. nt Mnemosyne Nov 2014 #11
Das reich der Zwei hfojvt Nov 2014 #12
One of the things working for us is the exclusiveness of....... wandy Nov 2014 #13
I'm pretty sure you can find someone on this board to passionately defend both sides of el_bryanto Nov 2014 #14
In NY it is just a check box and a signature, when you renew your driver lic or go to any. CK_John Nov 2014 #16
I don't think it is a definite black or white question... kentuck Nov 2014 #17
Good question. Basic LA Nov 2014 #18
The Lazy Poor... SomethingFishy Nov 2014 #26
They do not see it that way. Basic LA Nov 2014 #36
Simple, party and principles over profit. Rex Nov 2014 #21
A Purity Control Test? Baclava Nov 2014 #23
How about this... SomethingFishy Nov 2014 #24
adding now aspirant Nov 2014 #30
HMMM DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2014 #29
The party has always been a multi-ideology coalition Recursion Nov 2014 #34
My test results bigwillq Nov 2014 #38
Magic 8 Ball says: petronius Nov 2014 #39
Woo Hoo! bigwillq Nov 2014 #43
I don't know if it's specific positions so much. WhiteAndNerdy Nov 2014 #40
lock'em up aspirant Nov 2014 #41
The only true test is ones actions IdiocracyTheNewNorm Nov 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I would like to devise a ...»Reply #32