Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. Explains a lot. A LOT. That attitude is pervasive, to this day.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 06:14 AM
Nov 2014
But any Emanuel-style strategy of focusing on the wealthy is sure to exclude from candidacy all but the wealthiest and those who know how to attract them. If the Democrats continue on this path, finding candidates who represent a district's constituents will become increasingly difficult as those very constituents are shut out. Too bad that this, as Bendavid points out, is no longer Emanuel's fucking problem.


As Dr. Phil would say, how's that workin' out for ya?
It looks to me like some in the DNC would rather lose than run Progressives or be Progressives, because the deck is stacked against Progressives due to the money.

I think the DNC likes Citizens United just fine. More money for them. And Citizens United was born from a nasty campaign film about Hillary. The "other side" hates her that much. And, of course, the DNC could care less about whatever they think their base is. They seem to think condescension and jeers, Rahm-style, will work.

Um, nope. It is the issues, stupid. The economy, the jobs, Social Security, how safe are the foods we feed our families, how safe is the water. All of that seems like chump stuff, is the attitude I get from today's DNC.
All those things are bargaining chips, nothing more. Thrown on the table, undermined by a TPP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rahm in The Thumpin: &quo...»Reply #3