Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
4. Progressive Taxes were meant to be harsh on the Rich to make wealth distribution more equal
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 04:05 AM
Nov 2014

The top tax rate in 1917 was 67% on those making more than the equivalent of $35 million dollars in todays money. In 1919 it was 73% on those making the 2013 equivalent of $13.2 million dollars. Taxes were lowered during the 20's, obviously leading to the Great Depression. When FDR came into office, the top tax rate was put high again, at 63% for those making the 2013 equivalent of $16.7 million, raised to 79% in 1936, and in the early 40's it crept as high as 94% before coming down to 91% from 1946 to 1963. Ultimately this high top tax rate was in place until Reagan, which lowered the top tax rate to 50%, 38.5% in 1987, and then eliminated the progressive tax altogether with a 28% tax rate in 1988. Clinton reinstated it at not even as high as the Reagan years before 1987.

Why does progressive tax legislation work? It puts disincentives for the rich to hoard money, instead they pour it back into the business which includes hiring people and paying them better wages.

Progressive tax legislation, as the graph shows, worked in keeping the rich under control.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Woooooooooooooooow. Rex Nov 2014 #1
This probly would never have happened, had Dems and Repubs not colluded in the 40s KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #10
You are so right, we reap what we sow. Rex Nov 2014 #18
Greed has never been and never will be self-limiting. hifiguy Nov 2014 #20
True the scope of greed in the past pails in comparison to what can be owned now. Rex Nov 2014 #24
k&R nt Live and Learn Nov 2014 #2
The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us cantbeserious Nov 2014 #3
Progressive Taxes were meant to be harsh on the Rich to make wealth distribution more equal AZ Progressive Nov 2014 #4
It's meant to make money hoarders pay their fair share. If you look at it like grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #9
It actually disincentivizes them from hoarding initially. Sirveri Nov 2014 #25
Well said:) grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #31
I agree, but this is history. Too many people have never been exposed to it, and the oligarchs jtuck004 Nov 2014 #5
The solution is to tax them, make them pay their fair share, grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #8
Sounds a little like the workers on the plantation are just waiting for the Master to make it better jtuck004 Nov 2014 #11
Would you like to see us raise taxes on wealth, again? I assure you, grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #15
I would, absolutely. High time and all that. Don't think anything but a token gesture is ever gonna jtuck004 Nov 2014 #19
The Great Recession almost did, lancer78 Nov 2014 #27
Savvy! blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #6
K&R woo me with science Nov 2014 #7
Hooray! progressoid Nov 2014 #12
Harder. Longer. Faster. Go slave labor! sis boom bah. lonestarnot Nov 2014 #13
The billionaires' extreme greed is about to sink us into a global great depression. Initech Nov 2014 #14
.....but not for them:( grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #16
Two weeks of a mass general strike/boycott would help balance that out real fast. nt Zorra Nov 2014 #17
one trouble with that statistic hfojvt Nov 2014 #21
Should be better when we get to 90% with zero! grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #22
that's kind of what I mean though hfojvt Nov 2014 #23
And until they start to suffer, lancer78 Nov 2014 #28
striking graphic drray23 Nov 2014 #26
Their selfishness will be legend. grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #30
K&R liberal_at_heart Nov 2014 #29
kick lonestarnot Dec 2014 #32
Why doesn't this kick? lonestarnot Dec 2014 #33
Lord i don't know! grahamhgreen Dec 2014 #34
Hmmm. lonestarnot Dec 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top .1% of wealth about t...»Reply #4