Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama says FCC should reclassify internet as a utility [View all]
President Obama has come out in support of reclassifying internet service as a utility, a move that would allow the Federal Communications Commission to enforce more robust regulations and protect net neutrality. "To put these protections in place, I'm asking the FCC to reclassifying internet service under Title II of a law known as the Telecommunications Act," Obama says in a statement this morning. "In plain English, I'm asking [the FCC] to recognize that for most Americans, the internet has become an essential part of everyday communication and everyday life."
There's been a growing battle around protecting net neutrality the principle that all internet traffic, no matter what it is or where it comes from, should be treated equally ever since the FCC's original protections were struck down in court earlier this year. Those protections were able to be struck down because the commission didn't make the rules in a way that it actually had authority over, so it's been trying to create new rules that it will definitely be able to enforce. It hasn't chosen to use Title II so far, but net neutrality advocates, now including President Obama, have been pushing for its use.
Regulating internet service under Title II would mean reclassifying it as a utility, like water. This means that internet providers would just be pumping internet back and forth through pipes and not actually making any decisions about where the internet goes. For the most part, that's a controversial idea in the eyes of service providers alone. It means that they're losing some control over what they sell, and that they can't favor certain services to benefit their own business. Instead, providers would be stuck allowing consumers to use the internet as they want to, using whatever services they like without any penalty. If that sounds pretty great, it's because that's basically how the internet has worked up until now.
There's been a growing battle around protecting net neutrality the principle that all internet traffic, no matter what it is or where it comes from, should be treated equally ever since the FCC's original protections were struck down in court earlier this year. Those protections were able to be struck down because the commission didn't make the rules in a way that it actually had authority over, so it's been trying to create new rules that it will definitely be able to enforce. It hasn't chosen to use Title II so far, but net neutrality advocates, now including President Obama, have been pushing for its use.
Regulating internet service under Title II would mean reclassifying it as a utility, like water. This means that internet providers would just be pumping internet back and forth through pipes and not actually making any decisions about where the internet goes. For the most part, that's a controversial idea in the eyes of service providers alone. It means that they're losing some control over what they sell, and that they can't favor certain services to benefit their own business. Instead, providers would be stuck allowing consumers to use the internet as they want to, using whatever services they like without any penalty. If that sounds pretty great, it's because that's basically how the internet has worked up until now.
http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/10/7185933/fcc-should-reclassify-internet-as-utility-obama-says
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes. This way, Obama gets to look like he is on the right side of things. He didn't do wrong.
JDPriestly
Nov 2014
#73
Who controls (in practical not official terms) the FCC? Would Congress have to be involved? nt
valerief
Nov 2014
#5
This is called empty rhetoric. He knows that the FCC isn't going to go along, but
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#40
So do I...and where were Dem Candidates saying Internet should be available to all
KoKo
Nov 2014
#44
Hopefully, this will lead to bandwidth being billed like a utility - for total usage.
vademocrat
Nov 2014
#11
Net neutrality doesn't impact VLAN's/VWAN's or other forms of network segmentation.
Xithras
Nov 2014
#15
I can already hear the Right screaming that he wants the Internet to be "Socialized".
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2014
#12
These people honestly believe voting and prayer have the same supernatural power over reality...
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2014
#92
Horrible! Almost like the streets in our neighborhoods! Armageddon is approaching!
RufusTFirefly
Nov 2014
#89
Not really, some of my best socializing has been parked far away from those things in the dark.
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2014
#95
Given the choice of government regulation or comcast regulation, I prefer the former. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2014
#57
Giving Republicans the ability to regulate the Internet without going through Congress....
Xithras
Nov 2014
#61
Nothing should be "banned" from viewing, short of CP, animal-crush, and rape and snuff films.
Ampersand Unicode
Nov 2014
#63
Completely agree! I made a similar point above before realizing you'd already expressed it well.
RufusTFirefly
Nov 2014
#91
There will probably be a lot of liberal-sounding bluster from Obama and Reid and Pelosi
Doctor_J
Nov 2014
#76
Because he might have had to actually deliver then. Now he's got a Congress he can work with,
NorthCarolina
Nov 2014
#85
Obama should have said this LAST Monday- it would have brought out youth voters
stuffmatters
Nov 2014
#41
Kudos on this one! He has some power here to force that decision, let's hope he uses it.
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#43
He is telling the FCC they "should" do the right thing. How much is that worth, really?
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#46
this kind of passion from the President would have been fantastic before the mid terms
samsingh
Nov 2014
#65