General Discussion

MineralMan

(151,624 posts)

10. I think you make some excellent points.

Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:00 PM

Nov 2014

Elizabeth Warren is going to have some trouble with her fairly long period as a Republican. While she's popular for her economic positions, her support for Reagan is going to be a liability for those who remember Reagan for his negative positions on so many things. I suspect that if she actually ran, people would soon find reasons why she shouldn't be elected. On the positive side, she doesn't have a long career as an elected official, so you can't find actual voting records, but that's also a potential negative.

I think she's going to decide not to run. She has an excellent position, currently, that gives her a good deal of political clout, and can probably continue to serve in that capacity for a good long time. Running for President is a tough gig. It looks to me like she is a Hillary supporter for 2016.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

166 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For those who would prefer a different presidential candidate than Hillary [View all] MineralMan Nov 2014 OP

Your suggestions are spot on, my dear MineralMan. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2014 #1

Looks like right now JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #2

Well, of the ones you named: MineralMan Nov 2014 #7

Just throwing some ideas out there for people JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #16

That's good. We need to be discussing this right now. MineralMan Nov 2014 #19

A few more zipplewrath Nov 2014 #42

Julian Castro came up in the thread. MineralMan Nov 2014 #43

Clark and Richardson zipplewrath Nov 2014 #46

Well, that's true enough. MineralMan Nov 2014 #49

I agree with your opinion. Gov Schweitzer(sp?) is another mentioned. 7962 Nov 2014 #103

Franken jeff47 Nov 2014 #20

Has he even hinted at a run though? JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #24

I asked him if he'd consider a run at a campaign MineralMan Nov 2014 #32

So he's like Booker without the polish? JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #35

No, I don't think so. I think that he's just MineralMan Nov 2014 #37

I also think he realizes as a Senator he has more power to help people justiceischeap Nov 2014 #65

That, too. He's been very helpful to Minnesotans who MineralMan Nov 2014 #66

He is a policy wonk, in heaven now. SomeGuyInEagan Nov 2014 #110

Yes, he truly seems at home in the Senate. MineralMan Nov 2014 #112

And one of the things people seem to forget is that a Senator who stays in for years gains power jwirr Nov 2014 #111

That's very true. I don't know how long Franken intends to serve MineralMan Nov 2014 #114

No idea. jeff47 Nov 2014 #34

Franken in debate with Clinton would be awesome! LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #33

Other names Jim Lane Nov 2014 #76

Schweitzer JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #99

Agree. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2014 #141

He would be so disruptive! JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #142

I think he would appeal to the economic populists lumberjack_jeff Nov 2014 #144

In fairness BeyondGeography Nov 2014 #3

I think you make some excellent points. MineralMan Nov 2014 #10

Some people just want to attack Hillary. Kingofalldems Nov 2014 #4

It's a convenient way to attack Democrats... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2014 #108

I met Gov OMalley (Md) this summer when he was campaigning Peacetrain Nov 2014 #5

I don't have a particular candidate I want to see run JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #29

Big pass on O'Malley Bmore84 Nov 2014 #52

That is interesting.. I have heard quite the opposite.. Peacetrain Nov 2014 #70

I would still like to see him in a primary run JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #73

I also live in Baltimore City and sus453 Nov 2014 #91

Agreed! BobbyBoring Nov 2014 #96

What bullshit. I'd never accept a damn GPS if I could find a way around it. 7962 Nov 2014 #107

I'm not a big O'Malley fan, but sus453 Nov 2014 #121

My son is a millennial..in fact he belongs to DU Peacetrain Nov 2014 #67

Biden and Edwards JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #74

Never cared for Edwards.. Peacetrain Nov 2014 #80

Now I liked Edwards even when I met him in 2004 JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #94

Jim Webb B2G Nov 2014 #6

Hmm....I don't think he can win the support of progressives, and MineralMan Nov 2014 #8

You're probably right, but if this election taught us anything B2G Nov 2014 #25

Wow, I think you totally missed the message of this last election. BillZBubb Nov 2014 #88

Almost all of our losers had that supposed strong appeal for unaffiliated voters. stillwaiting Nov 2014 #138

Probably nobody will be interested in running from the D side hfojvt Nov 2014 #9

and the OP knows that- but still keeps posting this same OP cali Nov 2014 #12

You keep saying that. So, link to some other examples of an OP MineralMan Nov 2014 #40

I suspect you're right. Given her polling, it may be very difficult MineralMan Nov 2014 #13

I'd say it's virtually certain that we'll have at least two candidates. Jim Lane Nov 2014 #71

ah Gravel, the progressive hero hfojvt Nov 2014 #78

sorry, but there's really NOTHING WHATSOFUCKING EVER that those of us who cali Nov 2014 #11

Wow. Negative, negative, negative. Is it possible to be more negative? Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #14

Good question. MineralMan Nov 2014 #17

GOPers want negativity, they love it Iliyah Nov 2014 #92

So, if that's true, what's your plan for 2016? MineralMan Nov 2014 #15

What kind? zipplewrath Nov 2014 #44

The kind that win primaries and are running against Republicans. MineralMan Nov 2014 #47

Arlen Spector zipplewrath Nov 2014 #48

I never voted for Arlen Spector. He's never been on any ballot MineralMan Nov 2014 #51

Well to quote you zipplewrath Nov 2014 #54

I have no idea what you're asking about. MineralMan Nov 2014 #55

The one backed by Obama zipplewrath Nov 2014 #63

Arlen Specter blew with the wind. MineralMan Nov 2014 #64

Is this the kind you want? zipplewrath Nov 2014 #72

No. I thought he was dead. So he can't run. MineralMan Nov 2014 #86

So you continue to avoid the question. zipplewrath Nov 2014 #98

You know, when elected to office as a Democrat, Specter voted MineralMan Nov 2014 #105

You keep avoiding the substance of the question. zipplewrath Nov 2014 #146

I think they're going to run MannyG. nt tridim Nov 2014 #132

Third-Way Manny? Say it ain't so, Joe. MineralMan Nov 2014 #134

But THE most important question is...what do they look like? randome Nov 2014 #18

That's a downside for some people for sure. MineralMan Nov 2014 #23

THANK YOU! That's one of the truest statements illustrating the absolute necessity of revolution Zorra Nov 2014 #39

Nothing Robbins Nov 2014 #21

Where has Julian Castro been the past couple of years? randome Nov 2014 #22

Let's see: MineralMan Nov 2014 #27

He gave the keynote address in 2012 so chatter was that he was being 'groomed' for bigger things. randome Nov 2014 #30

Yes, he did. I remember. MineralMan Nov 2014 #36

I could see him as Veep JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #31

Yes, I can, too, and suspect that's why we're not MineralMan Nov 2014 #38

That would be Bernie. I have written, donated money to his Senate campaign and will Autumn Nov 2014 #26

If he's going to run, then he needs to declare and MineralMan Nov 2014 #28

I wish he would declare and set up a campaign but I see no hurry for him to switch parties yet. Autumn Nov 2014 #41

I disagree about the party thing. MineralMan Nov 2014 #45

The Democratic Party does have a lot of history. But their recent history Autumn Nov 2014 #164

Well, Bernie Sanders will do what he thinks best, I'm sure. MineralMan Nov 2014 #165

I prefer Sen. Whitehouse. He has all I'd like in a President. shraby Nov 2014 #50

I like Whitehouse, too. Is he considering a run? MineralMan Nov 2014 #53

Not that I know of. Sure would like to see it though. I think he shraby Nov 2014 #158

I always thought a Whitehouse in the Whitehouse had a nice ring to it. (NT) bhcodem Nov 2014 #145

Nita Lowey Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #56

You're not the first to mention Webb. MineralMan Nov 2014 #58

Probably not Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #77

Of all the political races, the presidency really requires a real desire MineralMan Nov 2014 #79

In other words, the "fire in the belly" and "happy warrior" type. DinahMoeHum Nov 2014 #104

That's a good way to look at it! MineralMan Nov 2014 #106

Question mainstreetonce Nov 2014 #57

YIKES allinthegame Nov 2014 #59

Can I have the budget of the DLC or the DSCC or the DCCC, too? merrily Nov 2014 #60

Anyone considering running either has set up a MineralMan Nov 2014 #61

How am I supposed to ferret out these people now? Besides, for two years, merrily Nov 2014 #84

Just search for any possible candidate with 2016 in the search MineralMan Nov 2014 #140

Warren has said many times that she is not running. merrily Nov 2014 #143

It seems like some people don't believe her. MineralMan Nov 2014 #147

Yes, I know. And? That's certainly their prerogative, but does that merrily Nov 2014 #159

Did Barack Obama fit that list back when he first ran? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #62

Sorry, but you were the "only one" zipplewrath Nov 2014 #69

" You don't get that because no one has heard of you." merrily Nov 2014 #82

Anyone in "the business" zipplewrath Nov 2014 #97

Totally agree. merrily Nov 2014 #100

Addressing the wrong people indeed. We out here in nowhereland will be Nay Nov 2014 #118

When he first ran, maybe. When the Party decided on him (IMO), no. merrily Nov 2014 #81

no, he did not Enrique Nov 2014 #90

yes, he did. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2014 #116

Of course he fit number 3 in the fall of 2006 onenote Nov 2014 #137

I respectfully disagree. MoonchildCA Nov 2014 #68

Bernie, Liz, Franken, Grayson joanbarnes Nov 2014 #75

All good names. Which would you support? MineralMan Nov 2014 #87

No way on Grayson JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #95

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #83

That's not a serious suggestion, now, is it? MineralMan Nov 2014 #89

Just kick'n and recommend'n... SoapBox Nov 2014 #85

Thank you very much! MineralMan Nov 2014 #93

... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #101

The same holds true for local races tech3149 Nov 2014 #102

An active local Democratic Party organization is MineralMan Nov 2014 #117

I was for Hillary until yesterday.. I have changed my mind.. Elizabeth Warren all the way secondwind Nov 2014 #109

But Warren is for Clinton... brooklynite Nov 2014 #149

Funding og1 Nov 2014 #113

At the primary level, funding is bound to be at the grassroots level, MineralMan Nov 2014 #119

Thank you MM for starting an adult discussion about 2016... groundloop Nov 2014 #115

No thanks needed. This is important to me, and shold be important to MineralMan Nov 2014 #122

There is a third path and that is Clinton / Warren azureblue Nov 2014 #120

I'm very sure that has occurred to Hillary Clinton. MineralMan Nov 2014 #124

No one cares who Clinton's hood ornament is. What difference does it make to "pair her with TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #160

While I deeply hate to admit ... JoeFH Nov 2014 #123

I think you may be overstating the problem. Depending on who MineralMan Nov 2014 #125

I can't tell you ... JoeFH Nov 2014 #131

The Dems will have a small pool of potential candidates Iliyah Nov 2014 #126

The Republican Clown Car is Loading. MineralMan Nov 2014 #127

Thing is, Clinton could be that candidate, or close enough. n/t Orsino Nov 2014 #128

And she very well may be the candidate. MineralMan Nov 2014 #129

She's also going to be the next president. Orsino Nov 2014 #130

I like O'Malley and I don't even know anything about him. Kalidurga Nov 2014 #133

Well, I don't know much about him, so I woudn't say I like him. MineralMan Nov 2014 #135

I learn as much about a person by who hates them as I do by who likes them. Kalidurga Nov 2014 #136

hard to say MineralMan angrychair Nov 2014 #139

Lawd...I hope you're wrong about HRC. Stellar Nov 2014 #148

Cory Booker might fit that list. Boom Sound 416 Nov 2014 #150

Maybe. I've seen people call him a third- way Democrat, though. MineralMan Nov 2014 #151

I'm still not clear on Boom Sound 416 Nov 2014 #154

Depends on who you ask, I guess. MineralMan Nov 2014 #155

Dick Durbin. raging moderate Nov 2014 #152

Well, lots of people don't want to run. MineralMan Nov 2014 #153

Um, Hillary only meets two of these four points. She's interested, and well known. Scuba Nov 2014 #156

I wish I could think of someone that fit these criteria perfectly... DeadLetterOffice Nov 2014 #157

I find 2014, 2014, 2014! There is plenty of time to worry about the Presidency after the election TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #161

I was one of those who promoted thinking about 2014 until MineralMan Nov 2014 #166

I see that you support Hillary. Why? senseandsensibility Nov 2014 #162

How is it that you see that? MineralMan Nov 2014 #163