Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is Hillary the Martha Coakley of national Democrats? [View all]Algernon Moncrieff
(5,961 posts)19. She was able to get elected to the Senate, which is more than Coakley could do.
At the moment she'd likely be favored over every known, likely GOP candidate, simply because she's better known and has higher favorables. Will that be true in 15 -18 months? It depends on who the Republicans look likely to nominate. I think Hillary whips Ted Cruz or Mitt Romney. OTOH, Scott Walker or Chris Christie present problems. Jeb Bush? Unknown - is he remembered as a former Florida governor, or as W.Bush's brother who's likely to be just as bad.
Surveys show that most people (by which I don't mean most people on DU) look back at the Clinton years very positively. The same cannot be said of the Bushes.
Other unknowns: a majority of voters say they don't feel represented by either party? Does an independent, like a Jon Huntsman or a Bernie Sanders (if he runs "I" as opposed to "D"
come along and capture some of those votes? If Christie or Romney get nominated, does the Cruz/Palin wing of the party break away and take about half the party with it?
Surveys show that most people (by which I don't mean most people on DU) look back at the Clinton years very positively. The same cannot be said of the Bushes.
Other unknowns: a majority of voters say they don't feel represented by either party? Does an independent, like a Jon Huntsman or a Bernie Sanders (if he runs "I" as opposed to "D"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Coakley HAS won statewide, a few in Mass have said there is some sexism when it comes to electing
JI7
Nov 2014
#20
The day that Coakley got the Dem gubernatorial nom,* I said, "Meet Governor Baker."
merrily
Nov 2014
#3
i'm pretty neutral on hillary, but no, there's no comparison here at all. not even close.
unblock
Nov 2014
#5
So if Hillary is the Martha Coakley of the Democratic Party, that makes Howard Dean.....?
brooklynite
Nov 2014
#11
Was also close until she realized it was over and her delegates pledeged to Obama..
joeybee12
Nov 2014
#44
Wow there sure were a lot of rocks turned over last night. The slugs and trolls are out in force.
Pisces
Nov 2014
#15
She was able to get elected to the Senate, which is more than Coakley could do.
Algernon Moncrieff
Nov 2014
#19
He won by 1 tenth of 1 percent of the vote. Your use of words like "clobbered" is misleading.
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2014
#35