Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
13. One thing
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 09:42 PM
Nov 2014

that I like about the political compass is that the ratings are based on actions, not words. In order to NOT move to the right in office, any Democratic POTUS would have to take a stand, to fight hard to at least maintain, if not move us further to the left. A POTUS who compromises with the right is inevitably going to drift to the right on that chart. Frankly, I'd rather have someone who will stick to their guns; that "nothing" that they get done is huge when it means we didn't LOSE any ground, while doing "what is politically possible" often means moving the nation in the wrong direction, which further weakens us.

Again, though, you are connecting voters' actions to those positions. I think that being honest about where a candidate really stands is the ethical thing to do, and I think that people who cast their votes shouldn't be propagandized into thinking a candidate is something different than he or she really is.

I think, from what I'm reading, you are suggesting that being transparent and upfront about where HRC, or any, candidate stands automatically means people won't vote for that candidate.

That says a great deal about where the Democratic Party is heading right there. I think it would be much better to support and nominate candidates who people WANT to vote for than spend an election using the fear card to bully people into voting for a candidate they don't like, or misrepresenting that candidate to convince them that he is different than he really is. It's telling, too, to see, inevitably, whose votes the party is willing to lose, and whose votes they are willing to earn.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

'That is how all too many rationalize not voting' onehandle Nov 2014 #1
That's a fancy picture but what makes you think it's accurate? rhett o rick Nov 2014 #2
Not just social issues gmb92 Nov 2014 #5
Maybe it's just me, but all that pales in comparison with her decision to betray us and support Bush rhett o rick Nov 2014 #7
I'm assuming you're referring to the Iraq war gmb92 Nov 2014 #11
I hear you and appreciate your reasonable responses to my pointed posts. rhett o rick Nov 2014 #12
I don't think any one leader can lead us out of oligarchy gmb92 Nov 2014 #20
She is a War Monger, it is not just the Iraq War. Her Foreign Policies are Republican Foreign sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #24
Totally agree, Rhett Carolina Nov 2014 #25
It's not just you. Scuba Nov 2014 #27
Agree. A warmonger. Nothing more. Katashi_itto Nov 2014 #32
I prefer this one: LWolf Nov 2014 #3
If one is to the right of FDR go join another party that would be the rule if I was in charge IdiocracyTheNewNorm Nov 2014 #4
Europe gmb92 Nov 2014 #6
Their methodology LWolf Nov 2014 #8
Stalin and Communism gmb92 Nov 2014 #9
One thing LWolf Nov 2014 #13
Ratings gmb92 Nov 2014 #15
Where might a socialist land on that chart? Where would someone like Sen Sanders? rhett o rick Nov 2014 #10
That's a good question. LWolf Nov 2014 #14
Sanders might be near the center gmb92 Nov 2014 #16
At the bottom of this page: Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #17
Yeh, St. Ralph who gave us Bush and Iraq war and took Rethug money to do it HERVEPA Nov 2014 #26
Ignorance is bliss. nt LWolf Nov 2014 #36
Exactly. When I hear people hate Hillary Clinton, but can't back it with actual reasons bhikkhu Nov 2014 #18
Some of the reasons are valid gmb92 Nov 2014 #21
I know what that's like - sometimes people pick out one act to hate a person for bhikkhu Nov 2014 #22
Maybe you didn't listen to her speech where she mimicked the Bush lies about WMD rhett o rick Nov 2014 #23
Not a good graph BlindTiresias Nov 2014 #19
Pro war, pro Wall Street, pro TPP, pro Keystone XL, pro H-1B visas. Yep, that's a liberal all right. Scuba Nov 2014 #28
This one reminds to take to heart... 99Forever Nov 2014 #29
"On the issues" is a terribly misleading domain name for this stupid argument. Orsino Nov 2014 #30
Can you have social justice without economic justice? I don't believe so. CrispyQ Nov 2014 #31
Screw the fancy charts. When it comes to the vote. I will write in Darth Vader. He represents a Katashi_itto Nov 2014 #33
I like that idea... LP2K12 Nov 2014 #35
Thanks for posting this. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton's Voting ...»Reply #13