Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mvymvy

(309 posts)
19. National Popular Vote Bill - 61% of the way of going into effect
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 01:41 PM
Nov 2014

By state laws, without changing anything in the Constitution, The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the majority of Electoral College votes, and thus the presidency, to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country, by replacing state winner-take-all laws for awarding electoral votes.

Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps of pre-determined outcomes. There would no longer be a handful of 'battleground' states where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in 80% of the states that now are just 'spectators' and ignored after the conventions.

The bill would take effect when enacted by states with a majority of Electoral College votes—that is, enough to elect a President (270 of 538). The candidate receiving the most popular votes from all 50 states (and DC) would get all the 270+ electoral votes of the enacting states.

The presidential election system, using the 48 state winner-take-all method or district winner method of awarding electoral votes, that we have today was not designed, anticipated, or favored by the Founders. It is the product of decades of change precipitated by the emergence of political parties and enactment by 48 states of winner-take-all laws, not mentioned, much less endorsed, in the Constitution.

The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founders in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for President. States can, and have, changed their method of awarding electoral votes over the years. Historically, major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action.

In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided).

Support for a national popular vote is strong among Republicans, Democrats, and Independent voters, as well as every demographic group in every state surveyed recently. In virtually every of the 39 states surveyed, overall support has been in the 70-80% range or higher. - in recent or past closely divided battleground states, in rural states, in small states, in Southern and border states, in big states, and in other states polled.
Americans believe that the candidate who receives the most votes should win.

The bill has passed 33 state legislative chambers in 22 rural, small, medium, large, red, blue, and purple states with 250 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 11 jurisdictions with 165 electoral votes – 61% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.

NationalPopularVote
Follow National Popular Vote on Facebook via NationalPopularVoteInc

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fuck those goddamn sacks of shit Blue Owl Nov 2014 #1
Maine and Nebraska already do this yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #2
Agree SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #3
National Popular Vote Bill - 61% of the way of going into effect mvymvy Nov 2014 #19
"seems" being the operative word here. unblock Nov 2014 #26
Individual states would do it based on whether or not they thought it would help Republicans. drm604 Nov 2014 #4
Ugh! yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #5
I'm not sure there are any Democratic majority states where it would help Democrats n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #7
we would need democratic control of a state that usually votes for the republican for president. unblock Nov 2014 #28
Yeah, but they're not trying to do it in all 50 states. DanTex Nov 2014 #6
Right now candidates only focus on 8 swing states and ignore the other 42, 4139 Nov 2014 #8
IFFF changed in all 50 states, Focus Could Then be on Only 8% of Country mvymvy Nov 2014 #20
Maine has all of 4 electoral votes, and Nebraska has 2 . . . markpkessinger Nov 2014 #11
Let me be clear that I don't agree with states doing this SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #15
No, it's not off by that much in a single state . . . markpkessinger Nov 2014 #16
Agree on all points n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #17
Maine has 4 electoral votes, Nebraska has 5 mvymvy Nov 2014 #22
MI, OH, WI, FL, IA and NV would change to congressional district method mvymvy Nov 2014 #23
Of Course, the proposed change in cherry picked states would help the GOP mvymvy Nov 2014 #18
Except they won't push for it in Texas mythology Nov 2014 #21
The only other thing they could do Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #35
State winner take all by CD? earthside Nov 2014 #9
I think the way it is in Nebraska and Maine SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #10
Exactly right . . . markpkessinger Nov 2014 #12
In the 2000 election they were wanting to do away with the electoral college. B Calm Nov 2014 #13
Yep... Until It Saved Their Asses... WillyT Nov 2014 #14
Most Americans Support a National Popular Vote mvymvy Nov 2014 #24
So Robbins Nov 2014 #25
Hence the Voter ID laws and gutting of Voter Rights Act. Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #33
Gerrymandering only insures their control of the State Houses and Congress liberal N proud Nov 2014 #27
Instead of jacking with the Electoral College, just get rid of the damned thing! Zen Democrat Nov 2014 #29
3% of US Pop could stop amendment mvymvy Nov 2014 #30
I don't ever see that happening n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #31
This is the only college they care about. Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #32
So, it's gerrymandering at a federal level. n/t woodsprite Nov 2014 #34
Dictators. City Lights Nov 2014 #36
kick napkinz Nov 2014 #37
Keep the dimes, toss the nickles AngryAmish Nov 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heads-Up: 'GOP May Revive...»Reply #19