Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If the Supremes do gut Obamacare, the Firedoglake wing of the Democratic party will get their way [View all]Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)23. Perhaps you should review your post and see why I took it that way.
Glad to here you aren't joyful that many will lose their access to any healthcare.
By the way, many of us in states that implemented it as perceived will retain our hard fought access.
Have a great day.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the Supremes do gut Obamacare, the Firedoglake wing of the Democratic party will get their way [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Nov 2014
OP
"tea party talking points"? The OP is about FDL saying the ACA is a corporatist giveaway.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#11
Any suffering inflicted will be by those who chose corporatist giveaway over healthcare.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#13
"...losing those benefits will hurt many people. That is what I find nasty."
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#21
Please explain, specifically, how you could have gotten Lieberman to vote for single payer. (nt)
jeff47
Nov 2014
#30
Yeah. Liberman was going to be "The Guy" to torpedo the Dems. Him having been our VP candidate.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#36
Yeah. The GOP held its ranks; there's no way the Dems ever would have held theirs with everything
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#38
You don't need the ACA for states to move to SP anymore than Romneycare needed the ACA to set up
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#53
The Democrats controlled all 3 branches of the Gov when Max Baucus (D-MT) had single payer
nationalize the fed
Nov 2014
#16
Please explain, specifically, how you could have gotten Lieberman to vote for single payer. (nt)
jeff47
Nov 2014
#29
Good point. If the conservatives on the supreme court gut the ACA, liberals have no one to blame but
pampango
Nov 2014
#33
"firedoglake" which is what the OP is talking about.. were against Obamacare. End of story. You say
Cha
Nov 2014
#40
The irony is that simply expanding medicare would have been unambiguously legal. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2014
#39