Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
38. Yeah. The GOP held its ranks; there's no way the Dems ever would have held theirs with everything
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 11:35 PM
Nov 2014

at their disposal and a wave of public approval.



Maybe I'm just young and naïve but I thought when we voted for leaders they ought to display -- you know -- leadership. Had I known I was voting for an impotent, passive observer I would have stayed the hell home.

Enjoy you ACA -- while you can. It's the culmination of everything people worked for the last 2 generations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't think the end of ACA. yallerdawg Nov 2014 #1
The Rethug led Congress will not help to fix this law. n/t pnwmom Nov 2014 #14
If the Supreme Court rules... yallerdawg Nov 2014 #25
The ruling won't come out for months. jeff47 Nov 2014 #27
What lame duck Congress? Doesn't the decision come in spring? HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #28
If the Supreme Court delays ruling on ACA subsidies... yallerdawg Nov 2014 #34
Those bastards! How dare they be right! nt Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #2
If they were right the SCOTUS would not geek tragedy Nov 2014 #3
The ACA *is* a corporatist giveaway. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #4
No,you and your tea party talking points geek tragedy Nov 2014 #6
"tea party talking points"? The OP is about FDL saying the ACA is a corporatist giveaway. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #11
Claiming that the law is a failure for one. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #31
I guess it depends on one's definition of failure. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #35
And what do you think will replace it? Live and Learn Nov 2014 #8
Any suffering inflicted will be by those who chose corporatist giveaway over healthcare. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #13
They never had a chance. Live and Learn Nov 2014 #15
My "glee at seeing...people suffering"? Get bent. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #18
I was never wrong. I said I supported Single Payer. Live and Learn Nov 2014 #19
"...losing those benefits will hurt many people. That is what I find nasty." Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #21
Perhaps you should review your post and see why I took it that way. Live and Learn Nov 2014 #23
Please explain, specifically, how you could have gotten Lieberman to vote for single payer. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2014 #30
Yeah. Liberman was going to be "The Guy" to torpedo the Dems. Him having been our VP candidate. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #36
He was the one who made us pass two bills to make the ACA jeff47 Nov 2014 #37
Yeah. The GOP held its ranks; there's no way the Dems ever would have held theirs with everything Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #38
Congress is not at the beck and call of the president. jeff47 Nov 2014 #45
You don't need the ACA for states to move to SP anymore than Romneycare needed the ACA to set up Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #53
How is it their fault when the Democratic Party mmonk Nov 2014 #5
When did Democrats control the SCOTUS? nt geek tragedy Nov 2014 #7
I was speaking of Firedoglake. mmonk Nov 2014 #12
The Democrats controlled all 3 branches of the Gov when Max Baucus (D-MT) had single payer nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #16
Democrats controlled the Supreme Court? Cali_Democrat Nov 2014 #17
You obviously need to educate yourself as to what geek tragedy Nov 2014 #32
Control? You have a funny definition of control. nt Live and Learn Nov 2014 #9
So all 535 elected officials simply miscalculated? randome Nov 2014 #10
Please explain, specifically, how you could have gotten Lieberman to vote for single payer. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2014 #29
Cash LondonReign2 Nov 2014 #47
Tried. Failed. jeff47 Nov 2014 #50
Not for Connecticutt LondonReign2 Nov 2014 #51
IIRC, there were threats made to cut aid to Israel jeff47 Nov 2014 #52
Good point. If the conservatives on the supreme court gut the ACA, liberals have no one to blame but pampango Nov 2014 #33
Well here is what the in-coming overlords want... Historic NY Nov 2014 #20
Translation: Let them eat cake! greatauntoftriplets Nov 2014 #24
The fiends! JHB Nov 2014 #22
I believe all those things as well.. iamthebandfanman Nov 2014 #26
"firedoglake" which is what the OP is talking about.. were against Obamacare. End of story. You say Cha Nov 2014 #40
agreed. I cannot imagine that they will take away insurance from anyone. KMOD Nov 2014 #42
I sure hope so, KMOD! Cha Nov 2014 #43
I more worried about what other parts they will muck with, KMOD Nov 2014 #44
The irony is that simply expanding medicare would have been unambiguously legal. n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2014 #39
yep. But that was too big a task for Reid, Pelosi, and Obama Doctor_J Nov 2014 #41
It wouldn't really matter right? The GOP would gut whatever was there. Rex Nov 2014 #46
Ah, but there is the rub LondonReign2 Nov 2014 #48
Hmmm didn't think about that...money might just trump ideology on the SCOTUS. Rex Nov 2014 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Supremes do gut Ob...»Reply #38