Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Midnight Writer

(25,803 posts)

18. I am sure Justice Thomas will recuse himself

Reply to NRaleighLiberal (Original post)

Wed Nov 12, 2014, 03:58 AM

Nov 2014

After all, his wife works for a "non-profit" organization whose goal is to destroy Obamacare.

I mean, even though she only makes 700,000 dollars a year for her "work" there, and that is surely not enough to influence a Justice of the highest court in the greatest country in the history of the world, it may cause an appearance of impropriety and surely Justice Thomas would never allow that. (Insert sarcasm thingy here)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Why The Supreme Court's Power Play Is Disturbing For Obamacare" - TPM [View all] NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 OP

Very interesting procedural history, elleng Nov 2014 #1

What about equal protection. Would this have any affect? olegramps Nov 2014 #22

Probably not. elleng Nov 2014 #23

I don't see how the post by a CATO member has any effect on my question. olegramps Nov 2014 #24

'Equal protection' is elleng Nov 2014 #25

The Roberts court makes it's own law. Anything upaloopa Nov 2014 #26

And the road backwards continues... Rhiannon12866 Nov 2014 #2

K&R WorseBeforeBetter Nov 2014 #3

thanks! NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 #4

Yes! I sat out in shorts and read for a while. WorseBeforeBetter Nov 2014 #5

I am hankering for a nice kayak. Enjoy it - cold stuff will be knocking on our door soon! NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 #7

Then I'll sit out by the firepit and read! WorseBeforeBetter Nov 2014 #10

we do too. native New Englanders here, so the cool nights, smell of wood smoke - NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 #12

Mahalo NRaleighLiberal K&R Cha Nov 2014 #6

and to you! NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 #8

.. Cha Nov 2014 #9

This place is going to go apeshit bananas if the court disallows subsidies. N/t Calista241 Nov 2014 #11

One curious thing Rstrstx Nov 2014 #13

This is a very interesting article. riderinthestorm Nov 2014 #14

why not subsidies for red states too? greymattermom Nov 2014 #15

The law was written to not have federal subsidies so as to incentivize the states to create Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #16

Why should what Gruber intended matter? drm604 Nov 2014 #17

What he intended is what he advised which is what was written into the law which the lawmakers Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #19

In this case, the letter of the law is the problem. Savannahmann Nov 2014 #20

I am sure Justice Thomas will recuse himself Midnight Writer Nov 2014 #18

Yes bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #21