Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
19. Well, no idea about OP's view, but Emanuel thinks it should be illegal
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 01:41 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Wed Nov 12, 2014, 03:14 PM - Edit history (1)

and he has written that U.S. policy should be to keep it illegal.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1997/03/whose-right-to-die/304641/?single_page=true

The proper policy, in my view, should be to affirm the status of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia as illegal. In so doing we would affirm that as a society we condemn ending a patient's life and do not consider that to have one's life ended by a doctor is a right.



He does note there should be exception to that in extreme cases.

This is from an older article, which he wrote in disagreement with the 2nd and 9th Circuit Court decisions "striking down state laws in New York and Washington that forbid physician-assisted suicide."

Glad I live in Washington State, where after the 9th's decision we voted for a Death with Dignity law. Also glad his influence didn't extend to affecting that, though I am troubled by the influence he does have.
K&R for embarrassment purposes! This should have more exposure! TheNutcracker Nov 2014 #1
I remember when this story first broke. I didn't know he was Rahm's brother. kcr Nov 2014 #29
Yes. For those who said hey! I (or my friend) am 75 and still golfing! djean111 Nov 2014 #2
In other words he thinks people are here to work for the system and dilby Nov 2014 #3
I think it's funny. enlightenment Nov 2014 #4
Why is someone so "disconnected" advising the President on health care policy? TheNutcracker Nov 2014 #6
He's not doing that anymore. enlightenment Nov 2014 #18
^^ THIS^^ Plus his bizarre little swipe at his brother seems to have inspired him here, as if bettyellen Nov 2014 #16
Yeah....I caught a lot of cognitive dissonance in his words.. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #26
Did anyone other than me actually read that Atlantic article? beerandjesus Nov 2014 #5
Again, why then are the bat shit crazies advising the President? TheNutcracker Nov 2014 #7
'Bat shit crazy'? That's a kneejerk reaction if I ever saw one muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #10
Well, no idea about OP's view, but Emanuel thinks it should be illegal suffragette Nov 2014 #19
I was thinking about whether the thread starter wanted the person themselves prosecuted muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #22
I read that as TheNutcracker being concerned at the influence Emanuel has on policy here suffragette Nov 2014 #25
Why should it remain illegal? Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #23
You completely misread my post and reversed the views of myself and Emanuel suffragette Nov 2014 #24
"meaningless" is subject to interpretation treestar Nov 2014 #39
Sounds like a No. beerandjesus Nov 2014 #11
But they're OUR batshit crazies as opposed to THEIR batshit crazies. hobbit709 Nov 2014 #17
Wow, just a few weeks ago people on this board were all for this. Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #27
There was a lot of discussion about it when it was originally published 2 months ago muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #8
Thanks for that. Seemed strange that this would be coming up now. beerandjesus Nov 2014 #12
I did. enlightenment Nov 2014 #20
I think most people are misunderstanding what he actually said. alarimer Nov 2014 #9
I define denial of medical treatment as torture. Downwinder Nov 2014 #35
I don't think someone else should decide for the 90 year old treestar Nov 2014 #40
Sounds death panel-ish. nt Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #43
"Hope I die before I get old" ~ The Who said it best. aikoaiko Nov 2014 #13
No; they said it glibly, cynically, for money. Do you think Daltry would trade places with Moon now? WinkyDink Nov 2014 #30
Well he give the average Joe 75 more years of value then Rahm does. Rahm dones't think most Exultant Democracy Nov 2014 #14
At 73 years of age I tend to agree with him on much in this article. For instance, too many people jwirr Nov 2014 #15
More BS from the "third way" - TBF Nov 2014 #21
I don't mind doing it. Why shouldn't I? Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #31
... TBF Nov 2014 #32
This is a very deranged and dangerous man. "I live life by the data." I don't accept his premise: WinkyDink Nov 2014 #28
Exactly - and to a society TBF Nov 2014 #33
Life is imprimus. Society merely facilitates Life. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #44
He is a product of the times, we live in a Throw Way society. Rex Nov 2014 #34
Classic Republican thought on the subject of aging. If you can't produce ladjf Nov 2014 #36
His views (known for some time) and his involvement as an advisor....... WillowTree Nov 2014 #37
Thanks for making seniors more Faux pas Nov 2014 #38
Being described as a "trained oncologist" treestar Nov 2014 #41
I would hope he would TBF Nov 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel - Rah...»Reply #19