Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mntleo2

(2,642 posts)
35. Poverty Is an Institution it is NOT a "choice"
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 08:01 PM
Nov 2014

What is an institution? It is anything that is embedded within our society that we base our laws and policies upon. Websters Dictionary defines an institution as.”… a well-established and structured pattern of behavior or of relationships that is accepted as a fundamental part of a culture, any established law or custom…” The institution of poverty feeds upon racism, sexism (including LGBTQ), classism, ageism and those with disabilities in order to keep it in place.

In spite of the terrible damage this institution causes, as did the Institution of Slavery and racism has for 100s of years, institutions remain in place because they benefit someone. It will remain in place because those in the upper classes depend on this embedded institute for their own benefit, so eradicating poverty is *not* what any upper class people could accept. Instead they like to pretend that poverty is a ”choice’” rather than accepting that fact they enjoy many benefits because poverty is embedded in our society. They prefer to think they do not benefit from an institution that is like a giant spider’s web ensnaring those in poverty while continuing to benefit those “above” them.

What the middle class does not seem to get while they enjoy their dependence on the poor is that this Poverty Institution uses the poor as “canaries in the mine” for making policy and laws. So if the upper classes ~ especially the middle class ~ ignore these laws and policies because they think it will not affect them, they do not seem to get that those same policies and laws can also be imposed on them ~ or that they can be affected and benefit off the suffocating of others.

I can name some ways that the upper classes depend upon the poor, but it would be long and wonky. Suffice it to say many industries make big money off those in poverty, whether it is because of their dependence on cheap labor, gate keeping positions for those who "serve" the poor, our taxes (the poor make the greatest sacrifice for paying taxes than any other class, paying upwards of 12-17% of their meager incomes), tax breaks for the rich who "contribute" with their donations (when actually they contribute nothing because they use mega-nonprofits as their private Cayman Islands), our prison industry, government fees and penalties, rental housing, the medical industry, the list goes on and on...

So in truth while we pretend the poor depend on the upper classes, the reality is that the upper classes depend upon the poor, the institution of poverty for their own benefit. Nobody is going to speak for the poor because if anybody with a shred of morals recognized their own dependence upon "the least among us" and the suffering that dependence causes, then they would actually have to do something about it.



My (more than) 2 cents
Love, Cat

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

many "poor" consider themselves to be "middle class" JI7 Nov 2014 #1
Most people haven't realized how far down the class ladder they've been shoved Warpy Nov 2014 #3
one poll from probably over 10 years ago that always stands out for me JI7 Nov 2014 #4
Can't disagree with anything you've said theHandpuppet Nov 2014 #7
maybe during Reagan administration where wealth is worshipped and people JI7 Nov 2014 #8
I think the floor on Inheritance Tax is now up to $5 million....for each sibling VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #27
Not for each sibling, but ... dawg Nov 2014 #42
NO it IS for each sibling...UNLESS YOU yourself are inheriting 5 million... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #45
I'm a financial professional who does estate planning. dawg Nov 2014 #46
I think that's very true theHandpuppet Nov 2014 #6
I stopped blaming myself years ago. Brigid Nov 2014 #18
Can you imagine what will happen when it dawns on a critical mass of people Warpy Nov 2014 #21
That is exactly why thay are.... bvar22 Nov 2014 #25
They Will Lash Out Randomly at Anyone Who Appears to be a Little Less Poor AndyTiedye Nov 2014 #40
"Middle class" was always working class. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #24
Not correct Warpy Nov 2014 #43
Really, there's only a couple paychecks difference. hollowdweller Nov 2014 #41
And yet still nobody speaks for them, only the comfortable, so at least YOU are considered Dragonfli Nov 2014 #14
Pretty much Johonny Nov 2014 #32
"Middle Class" now says lower... jtuck004 Nov 2014 #36
Word. daredtowork Nov 2014 #2
No one since RFK and LBJ hifiguy Nov 2014 #5
John Edwards, warts an all, campaigned on helping "The Poor" in 2008. bvar22 Nov 2014 #26
You are right and I am wrong. hifiguy Nov 2014 #28
You're right. bvar22 Nov 2014 #31
That so many Dems absolutely loved hifiguy Nov 2014 #47
I think Pope Francis is about it. 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #9
If he keeps that up hifiguy Nov 2014 #29
maybe the poor UglyGreed Nov 2014 #10
5.8% unemployment, and 48 months of positive job growth. NM_Birder Nov 2014 #11
They should have invested those penny rolls in the stock market! adirondacker Nov 2014 #13
I think the general reasoning is that the poor aren't able to take time off Maedhros Nov 2014 #12
That and of course they are not a source of campaign cash which Dragonfli Nov 2014 #17
We must also bear in mind that the middle class has all but been erased. Maedhros Nov 2014 #19
To the Democrats, the middle class doesn't even count anymore. Triana Nov 2014 #15
And the Clintons were "dead broke." blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #16
I think socialists would speak for the poor. Look at a socialist paradise such as Denmark which has Louisiana1976 Nov 2014 #20
The American avoidance of the term "working class" is bleakly amusing. (n/t) Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #22
Kinda like when spoiled rich kids sing karaoke. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #34
Honestly ut oh Nov 2014 #23
The hell of it is the poor and middle class had an opportunity to speak for themselves and only Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #30
They also count the "middle class" as people who have a stock portfolio. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #33
Poverty Is an Institution it is NOT a "choice" mntleo2 Nov 2014 #35
If this is what you call speaking for us onecaliberal Nov 2014 #37
I think the first half of your OP title is being overly generous in some instances. nt NorthCarolina Nov 2014 #38
Clinton eradicated poverty with NAFTA and Welfare "Reform". Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #39
The Socialist Workers Party, I suppose. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats speak for the &...»Reply #35