Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
12. I live in a red district that republicans gerrymandered into eternal red.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:09 PM
Nov 2014

My district was in the big blue "Rez district" of AZ, and republicans gerrymandered me into a red district with all stupid rednecks. It went something like 70% republican in the election this year.

My vote means nothing here, except on school issues, etc.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Moving seems slower than gerrymandering to me. ZombieHorde Nov 2014 #1
I understand this is not an overnight process... MrScorpio Nov 2014 #6
Congressional districts have between 750,000 to 800,000 people. former9thward Nov 2014 #28
I'm already there! logosoco Nov 2014 #2
Does one have to use a residential numerical address, or can one use a mailbox? NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #3
AS far as I understand, voter registration is based on the existing legal residence... MrScorpio Nov 2014 #10
Thanks. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #15
Fight and teach. MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #4
I'm for going after that half of the electorate who don't usually bother. Scuba Nov 2014 #20
What are these "policy" thingys you speak of? MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #26
You remember correctly. Scuba Nov 2014 #39
Enforce the law in regards to gerrymandering. Rex Nov 2014 #5
6th district of Minnesota red enough for ya? 99Forever Nov 2014 #7
No redistricting will take place until after the 2020 census. MineralMan Nov 2014 #8
And then we'll gerrymander to help us n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #13
A better solution would be for every state to pass laws MineralMan Nov 2014 #16
Agree 100% n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #17
At one point, churches were moving people to purple states to turn them red. Some hit New Hampshire merrily Nov 2014 #9
Strategy would work in theory, but would be difficult organize and do wyldwolf Nov 2014 #11
I live in a red district that republicans gerrymandered into eternal red. Zorra Nov 2014 #12
Here's my suggestion, take the authority of redrawing district boundaries... Spazito Nov 2014 #14
Minnesota has a similar system. MineralMan Nov 2014 #18
It certainly strikes me as the best way to eliminate gerrymandering... Spazito Nov 2014 #21
Actually, I believe that the FEC should mandate such systems. MineralMan Nov 2014 #25
Wouldn't that run afoul of States' rights under the Constitution? Spazito Nov 2014 #32
That's the problem. The federal government can step in if MineralMan Nov 2014 #33
That makes sense, that's why gerrymandering cases considered by the USSC... Spazito Nov 2014 #34
I think gerrymandering was once illegal although I'm not certain. Cleita Nov 2014 #27
Interestingly, in trying to research whether it had ever been deemed illegal, I found... Spazito Nov 2014 #31
We did that in California. We passed a law stating that only Cleita Nov 2014 #24
I am really glad to hear that... Spazito Nov 2014 #29
Sounds like torture. I'd rather stay in my blue district. JaneyVee Nov 2014 #19
I've had that idea for decades. Although my idea decades ago was Cleita Nov 2014 #22
Better idea: Everyone get to work reproducing. We need a blue wave! FSogol Nov 2014 #23
It's not crazy ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2014 #30
Based on 2014 election? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #35
I did that gwheezie Nov 2014 #36
I have a better idea AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #37
Just how nuts are you? randome Nov 2014 #38
. baldguy Nov 2014 #40
Well, our gerrymandered "red" district just voted out a Tea Bagger csziggy Nov 2014 #41
We need to greatly expand the House, one rep per 30k or so and require districts be TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I know that most of you g...»Reply #12