Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Spazito

(55,539 posts)
31. Interestingly, in trying to research whether it had ever been deemed illegal, I found...
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:57 PM
Nov 2014

that on November 12, just 3 days ago, the USSC has took up a gerrymandering case re Alabama:

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday takes up the thorny question of what kind of gerrymandering is acceptable, and what kind is not. The court is being asked to decide whether a 2010 state legislative redistricting in Alabama overloaded some districts with black Democrats on the basis of race or party.

Voting rights cases scramble politics and race. In this case, it is the Democrats who are crying foul because of what they call unconstitutional quotas. In contrast, conservative Republicans, usually critics of racial considerations, this time are defending government classifications based on race.

In the 1990s, the conservative Supreme Court majority, in a series of decisions, ruled that if a redistricting plan is motivated predominantly by racial considerations, it is unconstitutional. Those decisions came in cases brought by conservative Republicans who objected to the Justice Department's attempt to expand the number of majority black or Hispanic legislative districts under the Voting Rights Act in the South.

"Now, the tables are turned," says election-law expert Richard Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. "It's the liberals and Democrats that are trying to use the racial gerrymandering claim to stop Republicans from packing reliable Democratic minority voters into a smaller number of districts."

http://www.npr.org/2014/11/12/363375057/supreme-court-case-seeks-source-of-alabama-gerrymandering

I'm not a fan of NPR as I think they have veered right in their opinions and coverage rather than being neutral but, in this case, given the OP subject matter, it seemed appropriate to use their site for it's information.

It seems there have been Constitutional challenges as to specific States' redrawing boundaries but not on the bigger question of gerrymandering.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Moving seems slower than gerrymandering to me. ZombieHorde Nov 2014 #1
I understand this is not an overnight process... MrScorpio Nov 2014 #6
Congressional districts have between 750,000 to 800,000 people. former9thward Nov 2014 #28
I'm already there! logosoco Nov 2014 #2
Does one have to use a residential numerical address, or can one use a mailbox? NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #3
AS far as I understand, voter registration is based on the existing legal residence... MrScorpio Nov 2014 #10
Thanks. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #15
Fight and teach. MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #4
I'm for going after that half of the electorate who don't usually bother. Scuba Nov 2014 #20
What are these "policy" thingys you speak of? MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #26
You remember correctly. Scuba Nov 2014 #39
Enforce the law in regards to gerrymandering. Rex Nov 2014 #5
6th district of Minnesota red enough for ya? 99Forever Nov 2014 #7
No redistricting will take place until after the 2020 census. MineralMan Nov 2014 #8
And then we'll gerrymander to help us n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #13
A better solution would be for every state to pass laws MineralMan Nov 2014 #16
Agree 100% n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #17
At one point, churches were moving people to purple states to turn them red. Some hit New Hampshire merrily Nov 2014 #9
Strategy would work in theory, but would be difficult organize and do wyldwolf Nov 2014 #11
I live in a red district that republicans gerrymandered into eternal red. Zorra Nov 2014 #12
Here's my suggestion, take the authority of redrawing district boundaries... Spazito Nov 2014 #14
Minnesota has a similar system. MineralMan Nov 2014 #18
It certainly strikes me as the best way to eliminate gerrymandering... Spazito Nov 2014 #21
Actually, I believe that the FEC should mandate such systems. MineralMan Nov 2014 #25
Wouldn't that run afoul of States' rights under the Constitution? Spazito Nov 2014 #32
That's the problem. The federal government can step in if MineralMan Nov 2014 #33
That makes sense, that's why gerrymandering cases considered by the USSC... Spazito Nov 2014 #34
I think gerrymandering was once illegal although I'm not certain. Cleita Nov 2014 #27
Interestingly, in trying to research whether it had ever been deemed illegal, I found... Spazito Nov 2014 #31
We did that in California. We passed a law stating that only Cleita Nov 2014 #24
I am really glad to hear that... Spazito Nov 2014 #29
Sounds like torture. I'd rather stay in my blue district. JaneyVee Nov 2014 #19
I've had that idea for decades. Although my idea decades ago was Cleita Nov 2014 #22
Better idea: Everyone get to work reproducing. We need a blue wave! FSogol Nov 2014 #23
It's not crazy ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2014 #30
Based on 2014 election? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #35
I did that gwheezie Nov 2014 #36
I have a better idea AnalystInParadise Nov 2014 #37
Just how nuts are you? randome Nov 2014 #38
. baldguy Nov 2014 #40
Well, our gerrymandered "red" district just voted out a Tea Bagger csziggy Nov 2014 #41
We need to greatly expand the House, one rep per 30k or so and require districts be TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I know that most of you g...»Reply #31