Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 07:22 AM Apr 2012

Now that Rahm is in IL and Nancy is out of power. Time for the President [View all]

to rethink putting Howard Dean in his administration.

Just like Dean taught us, that we should focus on state and local offices, the Republicans and big money
have done just that. They have doled out $500 bills on the local level and pushing through their
crazy agenda of Anti-choice, Pro-gun, and Voter Suppression.

Many have said it is inexplicable why the President doesn't better articulate his health care legislation.
What better person than Dean to do that?

For those who supported others, and didn't learn that much about Dean's biography, he's led a quite
impressive life. He also is amazingly forgiving after being snubbed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Dean

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'd love to see Dr Dean in this Administration madokie Apr 2012 #1
But he was excited and needed to be taken out. Far better to be gaffe prone. Then it rarely gets mdavies013 Apr 2012 #2
Me 2...I think I am at the point where I am tired of our same old rhetoric that doesn't seem Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #3
Keep dreaming. n/t leeroysphitz Apr 2012 #4
Love Dean--but could use a beverage while I ponder this pinboy3niner Apr 2012 #5
Ah yes, my obsolete name - created when Bush was caught drinking in China. Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #7
LOL! pinboy3niner Apr 2012 #10
Ann GetAJob Aerows Apr 2012 #37
At the moment Howard is not interested, but the (re-) election might change things DFW Apr 2012 #6
Probably a bad fit zipplewrath Apr 2012 #9
Interesting about SoS or UN Ambassador as a launching point. As we pull out of Afghanistan Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #13
By 2016 zipplewrath Apr 2012 #16
Yes....if things change dramatically from where we are now. I agree the backgrounds you mention Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #21
History disagrees except for the VP karynnj Apr 2012 #23
Secretary of State is still a good choice Alcibiades Apr 2012 #29
It would have to be intentional zipplewrath Apr 2012 #36
I think he really did want the HHS position karynnj Apr 2012 #17
You make a very good point. It is obvious that the administration does not Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #45
I agree - there are so many provisions that are obvious improvements karynnj Apr 2012 #46
maybe they are waiting for the SCOTUS ruling in June. Actually, without the Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #47
Wow...thanks so much for adding your insider perspective. It really does make Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #11
BTW, what you said about Dean thinking the young should take the reins...Who are Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #22
Howard named no immediate names DFW Apr 2012 #40
Thanks for the info! janx Apr 2012 #48
He has no Wall Street or CEO experience on his resume... OneTenthofOnePercent Apr 2012 #8
His father was a stock broker at Dean Witter. He tried a career as a broker. But, I Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #12
Unlikely. Jester Messiah Apr 2012 #14
You do know that Dean is somewhat to the right of Obama on almost every issue, right? Recursion Apr 2012 #15
I think he's more like Clinton. Fiscally more conservative than Obama. I think Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #18
Yeah, I was thinking fiscally. Though also guns and the death penalty. Recursion Apr 2012 #35
? Ship of Fools Apr 2012 #19
For example? MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #20
his position on guns Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #25
So he's not to the right of Obama on guns, either MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #34
Hmm...never got a response from Recursion. Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #41
Disappointing. MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #43
Yes Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #44
Yes, Dean. And how about Robert Reich? n/t philly_bob Apr 2012 #24
too short ! JK. Actually saw him on TV yesterday. He seems to have Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #26
Put him back in charge of the DNC. PassingFair Apr 2012 #27
Good points, PF! janx Apr 2012 #49
On the MEK payroll TomClash Apr 2012 #28
Forgive me, what what do Rahm and Nancy have to do with it? brooklynite Apr 2012 #30
Nothing directly...it was just rumored that Pelosi, Reed, and Rahm did not Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #31
No, it wasn't... brooklynite Apr 2012 #32
You are right. Personal dislikes have nothing to do with the merits of Dean in any Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #42
Remember lsewpershad Apr 2012 #33
Obama would use Howard Dean for credibility, as so much window dressing kenny blankenship Apr 2012 #38
Put him back in charge at the DNC so that he can help them Freddie Stubbs Apr 2012 #39
Obama likes Lieberman-style Democrats more. /nt Marr Apr 2012 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Now that Rahm is in IL an...