Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Siege of Julian Assange is a Farce (John Pilger) [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)15. What keeps us free is the Bill of Rights. So, on the Horizon: 'Super Injunctions'
Wikileaks Reveals Super Injunction Blocking Reporting On Massive Australian Corruption Case Involving Leaders Of Malaysia, Indonesia & Vietnam
Tech Dirt, July 30, 2014
from the no-free-press-for-you dept
We've written about the problems of so-called super injunctions in the past (though mainly in the UK). This legal process not only keeps certain details under wraps concerning a lawsuit, but actually forbids the media from reporting on anything related to the case at all. Such a thing would be clear prior restraint and not allowed in the US, but apparently is considered legal in other parts of the world. However, Wikileaks has now revealed what appears to be a super injunction against reporting on a massive corruption case in Australia, involving the leaders of Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam, along with people at Australia's central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia:
It's the reasoning given that's most troubling:
CONTINUED...
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140729/17501228048/wikileaks-reveals-super-injunuction-blocking-reporting-massive-australian-corruption-case-involving-leaders-malaysia-indonesia.shtml
UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada have this keeping a lid on Truth. The only one of the Five Eyes without such a clamp on freedom of the press is the United States and that, thanks to the USA PATRIOT Act, we don't really know as that's Top Secret, may already be history.
Tech Dirt, July 30, 2014
from the no-free-press-for-you dept
We've written about the problems of so-called super injunctions in the past (though mainly in the UK). This legal process not only keeps certain details under wraps concerning a lawsuit, but actually forbids the media from reporting on anything related to the case at all. Such a thing would be clear prior restraint and not allowed in the US, but apparently is considered legal in other parts of the world. However, Wikileaks has now revealed what appears to be a super injunction against reporting on a massive corruption case in Australia, involving the leaders of Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam, along with people at Australia's central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia:
The super-injunction invokes national security grounds to prevent reporting about the case, by anyone, in order to prevent damage to Australia's international relations. The court-issued gag order follows the secret 19 June 2014 indictment of seven senior executives from subsidiaries of Australia's central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). The case concerns allegations of multi-million dollar inducements made by agents of the RBA subsidiaries Securency and Note Printing Australia in order to secure contracts for the supply of Australian-style polymer bank notes to the governments of Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and other countries.
The suppression order lists 17 individuals, including "any current or former Prime Minister of Malaysia", Truong Tan San, currently President of Vietnam", "Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (also known as SBY), currently President of Indonesia (since 2004)", "Megawati Sukarnoputri (also known as Mega), a former President of Indonesia (20012004) and current leader of the PDI-P political party" and 14 other senior officials and relatives from those countries, who specifically may not be named in connection with the corruption investigation.
The document also specifically bans the publication of the order itself as well as an affidavit affirmed last month by Australia's representative to ASEAN Gillian Bird, who has just been appointed as Australia's Permanent Representative to the United Nations. The gag order effectively blacks out the largest high-level corruption case in Australia and the region.
It's the reasoning given that's most troubling:
The purpose of these orders is to prevent damage to Australia's international relations that may be caused by the publication of material that may damage the reputations of specified individuals who are not the subject of charges in these proceedings.
CONTINUED...
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140729/17501228048/wikileaks-reveals-super-injunuction-blocking-reporting-massive-australian-corruption-case-involving-leaders-malaysia-indonesia.shtml
UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada have this keeping a lid on Truth. The only one of the Five Eyes without such a clamp on freedom of the press is the United States and that, thanks to the USA PATRIOT Act, we don't really know as that's Top Secret, may already be history.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It IS amazing. There is NOTHING noble about destroying the Public's right-to-know...
Octafish
Nov 2014
#2
I wouldn't leave. I'd just change my name, and post using 2 accounts for a little while...
SidDithers
Nov 2014
#8
What keeps us free is the Bill of Rights. So, on the Horizon: 'Super Injunctions'
Octafish
Nov 2014
#15
I agree. He could probably work out a time served deal if he just came out now.
Recursion
Nov 2014
#20