I was reading Kathleen Parker's column this morning complaining about how the Seamus incident [View all]

[libinnyandia]

wasn't relevant to how Romney would govern as president. She went on and on about dogs and in the final paragraph described Romney as a man with "a knack for economic recovery". If she thought the "dog issues" were being overplayed she should have written one paragraph about dogs and the rest of the column about how Romney's support for more tax cuts for the 1%, the defunding of Planned Parenthood, increased defense spending, destruction of safety nets for the poor, etc, etc, etc would help the econmomy recover.