General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A pornographer (and atheist) explains why the science guy’s shirt crash-landed [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)something she doesn't truly believe, as you are clearly implying, just so that the patriarchy will accept her.
Maybe- hear me out for a minute, I know, craaaaazy
theory- maybe she genuinely doesn't think the shirt is a big deal, doesn't think it's offensive, doesn't think it's the societal harm objectifying equivalent to klan propaganda or whatever.. maybe she genuinely thinks ANY outrage over this shirt is NOT "serious", but instead is totally obnoxiously ridiculous. After all, that's what she SAID.
Could it be? Is it possible, just maybe, that she REALLY thinks the stuff she's saying? Is it inconceivable that maybe, just maybe, she's expressing her own views?
Because here you're either calling this woman a liar, or someone too oblivious to hold the 'correct' (i.e. yours) position on this. I don't know, that seems a little insulting to Ms. Kasparian.