Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
76. Good for you
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 01:04 PM
Nov 2014

I am so confused, though.

Your scum employer wants high speed rail so badly, he doesn't care who gets hurt. He needs to talk to the Koch Brothers, as they are the ones who DON'T want it and are blocking it everywhere:
http://www.attn.com/stories/295/monopoly-men-how-two-billionaires-are-destroying-high-speed-rail-america

"It turns out that the high speed rail debate is anything but dry, but if you spend ten minutes- or even a few hours- googling the topic, you’re bound to think otherwise. I began with California, given the sheer longevity of the project, and there’s plenty of discussion about the progress and setbacks of CHSR. The total cost of the project is estimated at $68 billion, and funding has unsurprisingly been the primary source of partisan contention. In 2008, voters approved Proposition 1A, which allocated $9.95 billion in funding and requires federal matching funds. Over the next few years, plans continued to progress; you can find a more detailed and accurate summary than the one I could give here.

In July 2012, Governor Jerry Brown signed an initial funding bill, which included the issuance of $2.2 billion in state bonds, unlocking $3.6 billion in federal funds for construction. But since then, U.S. Representative Jeff Denham of Modesto has worked to unravel funding plans in Washington. Denham introduced an amendment to the 2015 Transportation, Housing & Urban Development (THUD) funding bill, approved by House Republicans over the summer, which specifically prohibits any funding from being used for high speed rail in California. After blocking federal money for the bullet train, Denham then characterized high speed rail as a pipe dream to the media, citing the funding gap but neglecting to mention his own role in creating the shortfall. Still, that’s politics; I was beginning to get bored. Some people want to build the train, some people say the train is too expensive. This all sounded like a big boondoggle and a bigger headache.

But as I continued to research CHSR funding, attempting to make sense of all the numbers and propositions and amendments, a claim on a site called California High Speed Rail Blog caught my eye. In a post titled, “Don’t Let the Reason Foundation Railroad California,” from 2009, the author states, “One of the most persistent HSR deniers and opponents of the California HSR project has been the Reason Foundation. Funded in part by oil and auto companies, they were behind the notorious Cox-Vranich report released last year in an effort to defeat Prop 1A.” The Reason Foundation- I’d heard the name mentioned in connection with a few experts in a few articles, but what was it? How was Reason influencing the debate surrounding high speed rail? And did it have some sort of vested interest in doing so?

reason foundation

Like most think tanks, the Reason Foundation describes itself in the sort of generic terms it’s difficult to find fault with. The name alone suggests a decidedly non-biased group of stoic scholars, quietly pursuing truth from behind half-moon glasses and distinguished facial hair. The Reasonable Foundation of People Who Always Consider Information Carefully. The Foundation of Being Extremely Logical Like Basically Vulcans on Earth. The Seriously What Even is Partisanship We’re Just Doing Research Over Here Foundation. The page marked “About Reason” on their site gives a similar impression, stating, “Reason Foundation's nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition, and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge, transparency, accountability and results.” Choice? Competition? Rigorous? Research? Those all sound okay. And so it should come as absolutely no surprise that, one click away, on a page titled “Trustees & Officers”, I came across an all-too-familiar name."


Your rich dude needs to get with these other rich dudes and they need to get their shit together. It appears our overlords are at odds with each other...

And, fuck all of them, by the way


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bravo. How did you do it? therehegoes Nov 2014 #1
That people like him exist is simply appalling. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2014 #2
How do you "fire" a client? BKH70041 Nov 2014 #3
It's a way of thinking I guess - and actually illustrates my point. KentuckyWoman Nov 2014 #8
As a business owner, I would say I terminated my relationship with the client. BKH70041 Nov 2014 #10
Why divert the thread over a word choice? valerief Nov 2014 #13
It made perfect sense to me. 99Forever Nov 2014 #42
It's quite commonly used that way. whopis01 Nov 2014 #56
Words mean what we want them to mean dumbcat Nov 2014 #59
I had no problem understanding the OP. Control-Z Nov 2014 #63
She F%CKING fired his sorry ass and as far ad I'm concerned, the wording she used was PERFECT!! Ecumenist Nov 2014 #67
And it is a good point. zeemike Nov 2014 #31
I actually need employers more then anyone might ever need me. I'm an Heather Kube Nov 2014 #58
I'm really sorry renate Nov 2014 #61
REALLY? YOU BELIEVE THAT? WHAT is ANY company WITHOUT the employees? Ecumenist Nov 2014 #68
Hey, Ecumenist--long time, no see! MADem Nov 2014 #75
very well said. nashville_brook Nov 2014 #41
tiresome. mopinko Nov 2014 #19
It's easy. You just refuse to take on any more work from them. MineralMan Nov 2014 #23
"No, I'm all booked up" will do it Warpy Nov 2014 #38
I don't have to say "I'm sorry." You're right. MineralMan Nov 2014 #43
MINERAL-MY man...Allow me to give you this... Ecumenist Nov 2014 #69
Kudos to this Payday lenders randys1 Nov 2014 #77
I simply won't work for any predatory business. MineralMan Nov 2014 #78
I knew one of the biggest ones in the country on a message board a few years back randys1 Nov 2014 #80
There's a difference between one guy lending a few bucks to MineralMan Nov 2014 #81
"I don't want to work for you anymore. You're a pain in the ass and you never pay on time." Throd Nov 2014 #44
How the world changed over night. Baitball Blogger Nov 2014 #4
One may not wear sulphurdunn Nov 2014 #17
Unfortunately, I think that is happening to our entire country. nt truebluegreen Nov 2014 #71
There are so many times when I wish the top 1% could be switched with the bottom 1% hollysmom Nov 2014 #5
Like in this movie. valerief Nov 2014 #15
Yes, all the 1% are exactly like this bread_and_roses Nov 2014 #24
I don't think they are all like that, just a lot of them. hollysmom Nov 2014 #29
Respect? It's about exploitation bread_and_roses Nov 2014 #46
I disagree. hollysmom Nov 2014 #48
I also disagree ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #60
Absolutes are stupid joeglow3 Nov 2014 #53
The 1% is ABSOLUTELY exploiting & oppressing the rest of us bread_and_roses Nov 2014 #55
By that logic, you own it just as much joeglow3 Nov 2014 #62
The 1% believe they should run everything as we are Dustlawyer Nov 2014 #39
You can only eat 1% shit for so long. CrispyQ Nov 2014 #6
I've experienced similar circumstances. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #7
I have not had the same experience, hollysmom Nov 2014 #35
I don't think there was much planning on this. CrispyQ Nov 2014 #47
The company doesn't remain topheavy for long... hughee99 Nov 2014 #40
Congratulations TNNurse Nov 2014 #9
ah, that IS molly! ellennelle Nov 2014 #14
That's WUNNNderful, KentuckyWoman! calimary Nov 2014 #11
Does DU allow duplicate handles? nt Dreamer Tatum Nov 2014 #12
Terrific on two counts: that you did it and were able to do it. Bravo. nt valerief Nov 2014 #16
Actually it's bit of a hit. KentuckyWoman Nov 2014 #18
Sorry to hear it. Hope you get other clients soon to make up for the loss. nt valerief Nov 2014 #20
Two things PSPS Nov 2014 #21
That is a very clever way of avoiding discussions where you can't win. Curmudgeoness Nov 2014 #27
Fired, resigned, let go... SoapBox Nov 2014 #32
I used to be appalled by the brutality of the French and Russian revolutionaries. sarge43 Nov 2014 #22
I also used to feel superior to the Germans who let the Nazis take over. Arugula Latte Nov 2014 #25
I so agree with you drmeow Nov 2014 #54
KentuckyWoman, I'm curious how you went about telling this client that he was fired. Arugula Latte Nov 2014 #26
Bravo and... SoapBox Nov 2014 #28
Good for you, and I hope he knows why Populist_Prole Nov 2014 #30
And those who slave in China deserve better than they are getting too. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #33
My Father used to deal quite a lot with the very rich. He seldom said anything about them. BlueJazz Nov 2014 #34
You could have asked him if he thought socialism was a good idea Major Nikon Nov 2014 #36
Thank you for being brave, smart and caring! glinda Nov 2014 #37
I think this needs to come out more... Locrian Nov 2014 #45
There is a class war going on Depaysement Nov 2014 #49
Keystone is designed to supply China and India the oil they need to fuel the economy whereisjustice Nov 2014 #50
Good post, very informative nikto Nov 2014 #64
Wow. You must have some fuckwads as clients joeglow3 Nov 2014 #51
profit KentuckyWoman Nov 2014 #82
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Nov 2014 #52
That client must have been pretty horrible, good for you ! steve2470 Nov 2014 #57
K&R ReRe Nov 2014 #65
Classic sadistic slave owner mentality. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #66
I can empathize with you KW Denis 11 Nov 2014 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Nov 2014 #72
Setting the mark just a little impossibly high? IMO, that standard would be no standard at all. Hortensis Nov 2014 #73
I've never fired a client for their political views. dawg Nov 2014 #74
Good for you Tsiyu Nov 2014 #76
Proud of you Kentucky Woman...If we ALL did this it would be called a GENERAL STRIKE randys1 Nov 2014 #79
a guy has gotta do what a guy has gotta do. fxstc Nov 2014 #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I fired a client I've had...»Reply #76