Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
15. Agreed, and well-said, with a little bit to add:
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 11:09 AM
Apr 2012

No matter what, we do need some kind of replacement for the Dome at some point; sooner rather than later. It's not just for football -- there are conventions, high school playoffs and events, March Madness games, and so on. There's money on the table now; if the team moves, we're going to have to build a stadium and pay for much more of it ourselves.

taxpayers should not subsidize private enterprise....nashville built a stadium for bud adams spanone Apr 2012 #1
The vikings are going to move to LA Rambis Apr 2012 #2
As a Lions' fan, I feel your pain. Octafish Apr 2012 #3
Norris Division? You must be a hockey fan. KamaAina Apr 2012 #26
In my opinion, taxpayer dollars, no matter how they are collected, MineralMan Apr 2012 #4
Let Teams Build Their Own Stadiums smoking357 Apr 2012 #5
Considering that $400 million-plus are being supplied hifiguy Apr 2012 #6
Agreed, and well-said, with a little bit to add: Brickbat Apr 2012 #15
Good points. hifiguy Apr 2012 #17
Professional sports revenues primarily come from TV, radio, internet, etc FarCenter Apr 2012 #7
It provides more income for the owner Kaleva Apr 2012 #9
All the more reason why the individual owner should pay for the individual stadium FarCenter Apr 2012 #11
You hit it on the head. hifiguy Apr 2012 #12
Ford Field, completed in 2002, cost about 430 million. Kaleva Apr 2012 #16
Is the Green Bay Packer model valid anywhere else ? libinnyandia Apr 2012 #8
No. League rules prohibit it but G.B. was grandfathered in. Kaleva Apr 2012 #10
Would it work anywhere else if the rule was changed? libinnyandia Apr 2012 #13
Maybe. I really don't know the reason why the NFL prohibits publicly owned teams. Kaleva Apr 2012 #14
Honestly? 99Forever Apr 2012 #18
One of my brothers owns stock in the Green Bay Packers. Kaleva Apr 2012 #19
It's just another face of the corporate supremacist hydra, Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #21
But Green Bay is the only team in the NFL owned by a corporation. Kaleva Apr 2012 #22
I always thought Green Bay's was a public corporation tied to the city Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #23
William Clay Ford Sr. is the sole owner of the Detroit Lions. Kaleva Apr 2012 #25
I always thought Anita McCambridge was the best owner AngryAmish Apr 2012 #28
You wouldn't be interested in the viewpoint of mnmoderatedem Apr 2012 #20
Fuck, NO! I am opposed to any new stadium paid for by the taxpayer. Odin2005 Apr 2012 #24
This has to stop AngryAmish Apr 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Minnesotans - do you thin...»Reply #15