Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Mass

(27,315 posts)

5. Not a surprise, but the fact that advisers continue to recommend using talking points rather than

Reply to grahamhgreen (Original post)

Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:15 PM

Nov 2014

leveling with the American people is kind of tiresome and has created more than one problem with this administration (If you like your doctor, you can keep it, for example).

Do those people who advise Obama on communication issues really think that we are too stupid to get nuances?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama: There are "circumstances in which the United States might need to deploy U.S. ground troops" [View all] grahamhgreen Nov 2014 OP

If ISIS gets a nuclear weapons if the circumstnce. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2014 #1

Note the S - circumstanceS grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #14

What those "circumstances" are = ISIS To Do List nt 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #2

Huh. Is Occupy acting up again? nt Zorra Nov 2014 #3

speaking like this before the midterms would have gotten us more votes samsingh Nov 2014 #4

Not a surprise, but the fact that advisers continue to recommend using talking points rather than Mass Nov 2014 #5

I think it falls under the idea that Quackers Nov 2014 #24

This quote R.Quinn Nov 2014 #6

Is he telegraphing/foreshadowing something? CJCRANE Nov 2014 #7

Of course he's telegraphing. This is the soft sell for perpetual war. grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #8

He probably thinks that is a logical statement but it will raise hopes (from the right) and fears pampango Nov 2014 #9

"No boots on the ground in Iraq" dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #10

Ah, yellow cake.... and "We can't let the smoking gun be a mushroom cloud". Same tricks, different grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #16

Ok, let's play, ISIL has a nuke, if you know where it is you send a cruise missile, if not, you send grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #12

Saying he will NEVER send ground troops no matter what send the wrong message to IS. pnwmom Nov 2014 #18

I hear Dubya is free! City Lights Nov 2014 #11

Go, go Mighty, Morphing Warmongers! TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #13

Yuck. We need to stay out of the Middle East. bigwillq Nov 2014 #15

Is he supposed to guarantee to IS that he will never send ground troops to Iraq no matter what? pnwmom Nov 2014 #17

That is what he already did, correct? Here: grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #19

Then I think that was a mistake. It doesn't help to show our hand. pnwmom Nov 2014 #20

I agree. grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #22

Here it comes, woo me with science Nov 2014 #21

"We can't afford the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud" is essentially his argument, much grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #23