Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(64,733 posts)
21. It's just another face of the corporate supremacist hydra,
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 11:35 AM
Apr 2012

put another way corporate or oligarch domination over government and in turn the people.

By not allowing publicly owned teams, they can more easily play cities or states, basically the tax paying people, against each other in bidding up and paying for stadiums, getting tax breaks for the owners from those governments, and I believe more easily commercializing the game, naming stadiums after some corporation instead of the city or state which the team is based in, increasing the cost of tickets, all to honor the almighty dollar.

The greed has gotten to the point of being repulsive.

Growing up I used to enjoy watching football, the Vikings under Bud Grant were actually my favorite team, today I'm more likely to support the Titans but I'm still fond of the Vikings.

Having said that I've lost a great deal of affection for watching football period, too damn many commercials which has all but ruined the game for me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

taxpayers should not subsidize private enterprise....nashville built a stadium for bud adams spanone Apr 2012 #1
The vikings are going to move to LA Rambis Apr 2012 #2
As a Lions' fan, I feel your pain. Octafish Apr 2012 #3
Norris Division? You must be a hockey fan. KamaAina Apr 2012 #26
In my opinion, taxpayer dollars, no matter how they are collected, MineralMan Apr 2012 #4
Let Teams Build Their Own Stadiums smoking357 Apr 2012 #5
Considering that $400 million-plus are being supplied hifiguy Apr 2012 #6
Agreed, and well-said, with a little bit to add: Brickbat Apr 2012 #15
Good points. hifiguy Apr 2012 #17
Professional sports revenues primarily come from TV, radio, internet, etc FarCenter Apr 2012 #7
It provides more income for the owner Kaleva Apr 2012 #9
All the more reason why the individual owner should pay for the individual stadium FarCenter Apr 2012 #11
You hit it on the head. hifiguy Apr 2012 #12
Ford Field, completed in 2002, cost about 430 million. Kaleva Apr 2012 #16
Is the Green Bay Packer model valid anywhere else ? libinnyandia Apr 2012 #8
No. League rules prohibit it but G.B. was grandfathered in. Kaleva Apr 2012 #10
Would it work anywhere else if the rule was changed? libinnyandia Apr 2012 #13
Maybe. I really don't know the reason why the NFL prohibits publicly owned teams. Kaleva Apr 2012 #14
Honestly? 99Forever Apr 2012 #18
One of my brothers owns stock in the Green Bay Packers. Kaleva Apr 2012 #19
It's just another face of the corporate supremacist hydra, Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #21
But Green Bay is the only team in the NFL owned by a corporation. Kaleva Apr 2012 #22
I always thought Green Bay's was a public corporation tied to the city Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #23
William Clay Ford Sr. is the sole owner of the Detroit Lions. Kaleva Apr 2012 #25
I always thought Anita McCambridge was the best owner AngryAmish Apr 2012 #28
You wouldn't be interested in the viewpoint of mnmoderatedem Apr 2012 #20
Fuck, NO! I am opposed to any new stadium paid for by the taxpayer. Odin2005 Apr 2012 #24
This has to stop AngryAmish Apr 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Minnesotans - do you thin...»Reply #21