Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alert! For anyone thinking of adopting a pet from a rescue organization... [View all]truth2power
(8,219 posts)66. First of all, thank you, moriah, for a reasonable, polite response...
Here is an answer to your concern. From the link I posted in my OP, which, strangely enough, I don't think anyone on this thread has taken the time to read:
"Because there are a number of kinds of property, however, pets enjoy a special legal status. The law recognizes, for example, that pets are not the same kind of property as desks or cars. Rather, each state in the U.S. has laws requiring humane care of pets and criminalizing cruelty to animals. Other laws set standards for the care and handling of companion animals involved in commerce. So while pets do not have the same legal status as people, they are treated as a special type of property, a kind of property that requires humane treatment by pet owners and protects pets from irresponsible neglect and other forms of abuse by pet owners.
In contrast, under U.S. law, guardians are not owners; they are merely caretakers. Guardian status could reduce the petcare choices available to the caretakers. Legally, for example, human guardians must always act in the best interest of the "ward." What is "best" is determined by anyone with a self-proclaimed interest or expertise and who is willing to use the court system to force a caretaker to make the "best" decision."
In contrast, under U.S. law, guardians are not owners; they are merely caretakers. Guardian status could reduce the petcare choices available to the caretakers. Legally, for example, human guardians must always act in the best interest of the "ward." What is "best" is determined by anyone with a self-proclaimed interest or expertise and who is willing to use the court system to force a caretaker to make the "best" decision."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Alert! For anyone thinking of adopting a pet from a rescue organization... [View all]
truth2power
Nov 2014
OP
Kudos for going to shelter, but I really think you are over-analyzing the contract.
Hoyt
Nov 2014
#1
The "supervised in yard" allows them to retrieve neglected dogs who are left out 24/7
Warpy
Nov 2014
#26
Different places have different wording, standards and indeed the most restrictive do assume they
uppityperson
Nov 2014
#6
I'm sorry - I am happy to be my rescued fur baby's guardian, caretaker and owner. I don't care
jillan
Nov 2014
#7
Municipalities and advocacy groups increasingly avoid "owner" because an animal is not a thing.
LeftyMom
Nov 2014
#10
NKS (no kill shelter) worker here. The dogs are "chipped" before adoption and contain our ID.
lamp_shade
Nov 2014
#18
A pet *should* be like a child and not be "owned". It is a living being, not a piece of furniture.
moriah
Nov 2014
#43
We've always ignored the "agreement" to not let our cats into the back yard...
brooklynite
Nov 2014
#25
Our rescue dog will not let us even stand at the door while she goes outside
liberal N proud
Nov 2014
#27
In this case, the dog would NEVER be yours. THAT is the crux. I've tried to explain...
truth2power
Nov 2014
#46
They want to make sure the dog is treated well, and doesn't wind up back in the shelter
bhikkhu
Nov 2014
#31
I think all contracts should be arranged to protect the party with the least power in the deal
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2014
#34