Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah 41 votes against the Keystone Pipline [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)93. Chapter 13 of NAFTA
"The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) includes an array of new corporate investment rights and protections that are unprecedented in scope and power. NAFTA allows corporations to sue the national government of a NAFTA country in secret arbitration tribunals if they feel that a regulation or government decision affects their investment in conflict with these new NAFTA rights. If a corporation wins, the taxpayers of the "losing" NAFTA nation must foot the bill.
http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=1218
http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=1218
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A DUer -who might have been there- said it sounded like Native Amer. chanting
FailureToCommunicate
Nov 2014
#62
This is better than chocolate ice cream. Simply delicious...Embrace the suck Clare...n/t
monmouth4
Nov 2014
#7
Can the investors in Canada now sue the United States for lost projected profits, or to
djean111
Nov 2014
#11
Not currently but I believe that there's a clause in the TPP that will allow that. (suing)
BeanMusical
Nov 2014
#34
McConnell just said the Keystone issue will come up again for a vote in January nt
steve2470
Nov 2014
#14
Isn't the prevailing position here on DU that fillibusters are bad/unconstitutional/undemocratic? nt
kelly1mm
Nov 2014
#16
Only when they're abused for the bullshit reason of obstructing absolutely everything.
catbyte
Nov 2014
#31
Poling also showed 80% support for gun background checks, issue polls are useless, governing counts.
Fred Sanders
Nov 2014
#71
geez, bennet voted for it? well, at least it isn't like there will be an extra yes vote when that
niyad
Nov 2014
#78
Landrieu was a fighter for Civil Rights in Louisiana, Cassidy will not be on that side now.
Thinkingabout
Nov 2014
#52
yes, what type of future do americans & humans - regardless of color, and every
hopemountain
Nov 2014
#72
Watching all the long-time trolls throw crybaby fits over this and immigration is HI-larious
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2014
#75