Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jim Webb Forms Exploratory Committee [View all]PDittie
(8,322 posts)23. Because someone has to run to the right of Hillary
There's a huge unrepresented constituency there. Webb understands that Hillary is just too liberal to pull those conservative military-type white rural males that Democrats are going to need to win the White House in 2016.
And he's not running for vice-president or even Secretary of Defense either, by God. (This is not intended to be sarcasm.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I used to think Democrats steered clear of people who had formerly lost elections or primaries, but
merrily
Nov 2014
#13
A US Senate seat or a gubernatorial seat not what I would consider a local loss.
merrily
Nov 2014
#16
To be fair, O'Malley himself did not lose - he was term limited and his Lt. Gov lost the race to
Midwestern Democrat
Nov 2014
#21
I can't recall the exact words, but I do recall I had a jaw drop reaction when I heard it.
merrily
Nov 2014
#11
Here's a link to op-ed "Class Struggle" which he sent to WSJ in 11/2006 :
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2014
#24