Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wealth and income inequality took off under Clinton Warpy Nov 2014 #1
No, it took off under Reagan. gcomeau Nov 2014 #12
Look at the largest peaks on the end. Warpy Nov 2014 #17
I did. gcomeau Nov 2014 #18
Oh, come on now. And why do you suppose they weren't rolled back? merrily Nov 2014 #27
Oh come on now what??? gcomeau Nov 2014 #40
Dude, if you thought my post did nothing but agree with you, you didn't read it. merrily Nov 2014 #42
Oh I read it. gcomeau Nov 2014 #45
Sorry you are that easily confounded. merrily Nov 2014 #46
Yes, all it takes is rants directed at me for no reason. gcomeau Nov 2014 #47
Elizabeth the Beloved. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #2
Peace and Prosperity for the well to do: LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #3
I agree one hundred percent.. whathehell Nov 2014 #4
Hillary takes money from Wall Street for her pretty speeches LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #5
I'm with you. whathehell Nov 2014 #10
The fact that Chelsea married a Bankster tells me everything I need to know about the Clintons. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #23
The truth Is Robbins Nov 2014 #15
I would say there is a continuum, more so than three wings. And the Clintons are center right, merrily Nov 2014 #28
Obama himself said that 50 years ago he would be an "Eisenhower Republican". Odin2005 Nov 2014 #21
I know.. whathehell Nov 2014 #25
Obama said in the 1980s (Reagan era), he would have been considered a moderate Republican merrily Nov 2014 #29
His cardinal sins don't stop there either RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #7
We know why she gets money for speeches to Wall Streeters. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #8
I agree with you Robbins Nov 2014 #16
Wait a minute, much as i tend to agree with your post, hedgehog Nov 2014 #6
LOL !!! WillyT Nov 2014 #14
Here's the thing: Not Sure Nov 2014 #9
The Clinton meme, "fiscally conservative/socially liberal," or the DLC/New Democrat/3rd Way line, KJG52 Nov 2014 #11
No one seems to be disagreeing... Very telling... Fearless Nov 2014 #13
k & r!!! RiverLover Nov 2014 #19
I think the 1992 Election was a loss for real liberals. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #20
Agreed, absolutely. whathehell Nov 2014 #26
Yep. People tend not to mention Perot, who was a factor in both 1992 and 1996. merrily Nov 2014 #33
Yep, in 1992 the DLC took Clinton's freak victory as a mandate... Odin2005 Nov 2014 #43
Not only the DLC, but the Democratic Party. merrily Nov 2014 #44
Elizabeth Warren: I hope Hillary Clinton runs for president brooklynite Nov 2014 #22
Don't bring facts into this. nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #24
Every fact is not dispositive. merrily Nov 2014 #31
So? What did you expect a new Democratic Senator to say about the Clinton furor merrily Nov 2014 #30
I expect Warren to speak honesty, because I've been told she's not just another politician... brooklynite Nov 2014 #32
Good. Then go with the "not infallible" alternative in my post. merrily Nov 2014 #34
The implication is that she was too weak/scared to stand up to the other Senators... brooklynite Nov 2014 #35
My Reply 34 to you already covered that "point." merrily Nov 2014 #36
Will Warren vote for President Bernie? aspirant Nov 2014 #37
The only people who've emphatically stated they wouldn't vote.... brooklynite Nov 2014 #38
Still waiting aspirant Nov 2014 #39
Kick !!! WillyT Nov 2014 #41
Recommend... KoKo Nov 2014 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MUST READ: 'Elizabeth War...»Reply #19