Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Warren, Sanders beat Hillary in poll of DFA members [View all]
Last edited Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:29 PM - Edit history (1)
by Alex Seitz-Wald
If you only listened to Washington pundits, youd wonder why Democrats are even bothering holding primaries and caucuses.
- Charles Chamberlain, Democracy for America
The members of the progressive group that grew out of Howard Deans presidential campaign are not exactly ready for Hillary.
Democracy for America (DFA) has been asking their roughly one million members whom the group should support in a hypothetical 2016 Democratic presidential primary. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren was the clear favorite, with support from 42% of respondents, according to results shared with msnbc ahead of their release later Thursday.
In second place was Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is seriously considering a presidential bid as a Democrat, with 24%. Just one point behind was former secretary of State Hillary Clinton at 23%.
From there, the numbers drop off significantly, with former Labor Secretary Robert Reich who told msnbc he is not interested in running capturing 3% of the vote, and Vice President Joe Biden getting just 2%. Former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, who announced an exploratory committee Thursday, received less than 1% of the vote.
Warren has repeatedly said she is not running for president and there is no evidence thus far that shes interested. Sanders is seriously considering a run, and recently hired a top Democratic strategist to help plan a bid.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/warren-sanders-beat-hillary-poll-liberal-groups-members?adbid=746970968691085&adbpl=fb&adbpr=114945745226947&cid=sm_m_lastword_4_20141121_35989557
If you only listened to Washington pundits, youd wonder why Democrats are even bothering holding primaries and caucuses.
- Charles Chamberlain, Democracy for America
The members of the progressive group that grew out of Howard Deans presidential campaign are not exactly ready for Hillary.
Democracy for America (DFA) has been asking their roughly one million members whom the group should support in a hypothetical 2016 Democratic presidential primary. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren was the clear favorite, with support from 42% of respondents, according to results shared with msnbc ahead of their release later Thursday.
In second place was Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is seriously considering a presidential bid as a Democrat, with 24%. Just one point behind was former secretary of State Hillary Clinton at 23%.
From there, the numbers drop off significantly, with former Labor Secretary Robert Reich who told msnbc he is not interested in running capturing 3% of the vote, and Vice President Joe Biden getting just 2%. Former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, who announced an exploratory committee Thursday, received less than 1% of the vote.
Warren has repeatedly said she is not running for president and there is no evidence thus far that shes interested. Sanders is seriously considering a run, and recently hired a top Democratic strategist to help plan a bid.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/warren-sanders-beat-hillary-poll-liberal-groups-members?adbid=746970968691085&adbpl=fb&adbpr=114945745226947&cid=sm_m_lastword_4_20141121_35989557
392 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren 2016 - I grew up in a GOP household. Now, none of them are Republican.
TheBlackAdder
Nov 2014
#287
Sanders got the "Colbert Bump" this week, and the crowd already knew and loved him.
arcane1
Nov 2014
#127
I didn't mention hippies in my post. Yet the poster felt to need to make il-informed assumptions
baldguy
Nov 2014
#84
A "phony liberal" is anyone who works to defeat the Dem nom even before they're nominated
baldguy
Nov 2014
#106
Except that Karl Rove was one of the people orchastrating the attacks on the Clintons
baldguy
Dec 2014
#389
It's all theater to divide us. You're a major performer in that theater. At least on DU.
baldguy
Dec 2014
#391
Fine, let's have a primary - I guarantee you this: Ms. Clinton will lose every caucus and primaries
Raul Hernandez
Nov 2014
#377
If you believe that, then you've swallowed the RW Rovian lies hook, line & sinker.
baldguy
Nov 2014
#378
"Liberals" advocating purges believe that they can't gain support in the party through other means.
baldguy
Nov 2014
#381
So... yes, whoever doesn't fancy the candidate you favor is a "phony liberal"
Scootaloo
Nov 2014
#366
What I favor is a Democratic victory. If Sanders joins the Party & wins the nom, I'll vote for him.
baldguy
Nov 2014
#368
I think it's always a good idea -- when casting generalized aspersions, and proclaiming
Voice for Peace
Nov 2014
#98
Hillary started running the day she resigned as Sec of State, and Warren isn't running at all.
baldguy
Nov 2014
#102
The odds are purportedly very good that almost any Dem can win in 2016
Voice for Peace
Nov 2014
#110
I am not under impression on anything. She hasn't announced her candidacy or formed an exploratory
Raul Hernandez
Nov 2014
#207
The RW Republicans began looking for a populist conservative candidate in 1964.
baldguy
Nov 2014
#130
This article is 'reality' insofar as it shows what a percentage of DFA members prefer.
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#11
How are 'Public opinion surveys" scientically factual and not full of caveats?
aspirant
Nov 2014
#12
Trying to figure out your skewed thinking reminds me of trying to figure out rethugs' thinking.
RiverLover
Nov 2014
#42
No polls are valid unless The Inevitable is leading by 124%! and is the most progressive in history!
LawDeeDah
Nov 2014
#100
This poll doesn't exist on the Democracy for America website. I found it attributed to them elsewhe
RiverLover
Nov 2014
#48
So you're going to attack the pollsters because it's the only thing you have left
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#133
No, but pretending to miss the point is. Pretending Post 63 was anything but straightforward is.
woo me with science
Nov 2014
#113
you mean Warren? if you do you think Hillary Rodham would be a 'known' without Bill
LawDeeDah
Nov 2014
#103
In general polls people can claim to be whatever they want. A lot of HRC supporters claim to be
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#67
Science of all Wolfie has left or right, is your life worth more than a guess?
aspirant
Nov 2014
#329
It's ridiculous to write off Hilllary. Warren is not running. Sanders can't win. Find reality.
RBInMaine
Nov 2014
#158
The reality is Hillary lost a 30 point lead to Obama. Sound like a winner to you? Nt
Logical
Nov 2014
#387
Yes, but a poll of Wall Street hedge fund managers had Hillary running away with it.
Scuba
Nov 2014
#10
I seem to recall in the early days of that poll, the pro-Hillary folks were posting
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Nov 2014
#26
which would give the results of DU Democratic Millennials who participate in the poll
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#54
You mean the restaurant with the itty-bitty food and the insignificant sitting
aspirant
Nov 2014
#116
The Pundits claimed the '08 election was going to be Hillary versus Rudy.
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2014
#47
but whoever WINS that Primary will...what are THEIR stats against the competition?
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2014
#61
So Hillary it is time for you to start realizing that we do not want Dem-light. We want someone who
jwirr
Nov 2014
#55
Who is this we bunch? We need a strong person who can make good decision on running this country.
Thinkingabout
Nov 2014
#123
Yes, and I mentioned those issues. TPP means sending more jobs overseas, Keystone means ignoring
jwirr
Nov 2014
#351
I am one of many Democrats and we need a strong leader, these other issues will get worked out also,
Thinkingabout
Nov 2014
#352
That is all many of us are asking for. Let anyone who wants to run against her run. And work it out
jwirr
Nov 2014
#353
Likewise, all candidates needs to comply with the same rules of engagement.
Thinkingabout
Nov 2014
#357
DFA members make up about .1% of Democratic primary voters, and Warren ain't running
bluestateguy
Nov 2014
#93
Because this thread isn't about Hillary; it's about the meaning of closed polls
frazzled
Nov 2014
#214
Imagine a progressive group going with who is perceived as their progressive candidate.
Thinkingabout
Nov 2014
#109
'the party' needs to get behind the people. This appears to a ticket most interested would like.
TheNutcracker
Nov 2014
#111
Funny... Just yesterday DU was telling me that she could never win... And neither could Sanders...
Fearless
Nov 2014
#136
Yeah, and we still have two years to go. By that time Hillary might be out of the
Cal33
Nov 2014
#200
pulling ahead in the primaries? strike one; pulling ahead of Jeb or Cruz? their campaign's doomed
MisterP
Nov 2014
#143
Name a single Democrat who has said they wouldn't vote for Warren as Dem nominee...
brooklynite
Nov 2014
#354