General Discussion

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

17. Maybe you and I are thinking of different posters but using Ctrl + F doesn't

Sat Nov 22, 2014, 09:10 PM

Nov 2014

return anything like "compassion = gullibility"

There is this post --

I bet the DUers who defended her are feeling a bit embarrassed now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014929820

I smelled BS when she claimed that the money was in her "mom's bank account" and yet Mom did not show up at the courthouse with bank statements. Too many DUers were much more gullible, however.

But that's not claiming compassion is gullible. The poster is clearly saying he there was cause for reasonable (glaring, really) suspicions and those who chose to overlook those reasons for suspicion are gullible.

But that's not the same as saying "compassion = gullibility," which you put in quotes.

Are you thinking of a different post?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"compassion = gullibility" quoting a DUer on another thread. Do you agree? [View all] elehhhhna Nov 2014 OP

Who wrote that, Ayn Rand? JaneyVee Nov 2014 #1

LOL! Kath1 Nov 2014 #31

More an expression of asshole values if you ask me. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2014 #2

These days in America, yeah. Anansi1171 Nov 2014 #3

In the eyes of Republicans, compassion = weakness. That's just another ladjf Nov 2014 #4

Their ideological brothers have thought that before... First Speaker Nov 2014 #12

Do not agree kcr Nov 2014 #5

Only if you are intrinsically evil imo. Rex Nov 2014 #6

Punishment fetishists. Iggo Nov 2014 #7

That's Ayn Randian Objectivism where greed and selfishness are considered good qualities. MohRokTah Nov 2014 #8

sometimes that is true craigmatic Nov 2014 #9

"compassion = white guilt" is a better comparison. kwassa Nov 2014 #10

Yes, I was told by a Repub. friend FLyellowdog Nov 2014 #13

If it is about the woman who blew $190,000+ in donations you aren't accurately citing them. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #11

exact quote from the thread not good enough? elehhhhna Nov 2014 #14

Maybe you and I are thinking of different posters but using Ctrl + F doesn't Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #17

Different thread, I think muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #22

I don't think you read #31 and #34 in that that thread before replying there, or starting this threa muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #30

What other thread, please? MineralMan Nov 2014 #15

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. It certainly isn't an absolute. Lurks Often Nov 2014 #16

LOL my post was compassionate does not equal gullible. Kurska Nov 2014 #18

I think the OP is misunderstanding your post, but your symbology is unusual petronius Nov 2014 #19

That symbol (=/) is actually what we used in my masters level statistics course when writing papers Kurska Nov 2014 #20

This is the internet, though - statistics courses (and the knowledge therefrom) petronius Nov 2014 #21

Statistics course =/ the internet Kurska Nov 2014 #23

What you've currently got is '/=/', not '=/', which may be confusing muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #24

I changed it to try and clarify then changed it back to just keep it the way it was for the record. Kurska Nov 2014 #26

Easier to do the old and simple <> whistler162 Nov 2014 #49

I don't understand why this call out cwydro Nov 2014 #51

So what you typed and what the OP is saying are different? Rex Nov 2014 #25

Pretty much exactly the opposite meaning actually, so yeah. n/t Kurska Nov 2014 #27

I followed your link and wondered if you mean 'not equal,' There might be an ASCII for it Rex Nov 2014 #28

There is, I just hate doing ASCII n/t Kurska Nov 2014 #29

Or you could just type the correct symbol. Jamastiene Nov 2014 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author kcr Nov 2014 #55

Actually, the quote was "does not equal". moriah Nov 2014 #32

I hate call outs of other duers cwydro Nov 2014 #33

We used to have META to let out our thanatos Kurska Nov 2014 #35

To be honest, no. Not at all. AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #34

Why is this thread still open? Brickbat Nov 2014 #36

Don't worry, I'm furiously typing out my call out thread of this call out thread as we speak Kurska Nov 2014 #38

Ha! Brickbat Nov 2014 #40

Kool then maybe we will get a whistler162 Nov 2014 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Nov 2014 #37

How is this not a call out? rudolph the red Nov 2014 #39

I think poor writing. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #42

You have a point, I stand corrected. rudolph the red Nov 2014 #43

How very polite of you. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #44

=/ meaning not equal to is common usage, but okay. Kurska Nov 2014 #46

I don't know how many 'understood it perfectly' before Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #53

"Compassionate =/ Gullible" is the actual quote... SidDithers Nov 2014 #41

Uh NO. Compassion comes from wisdom and self-awareness. Avalux Nov 2014 #45

Anyone who believes that is almost certainly a sociopath. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #47

I read Kurska's specific post as meaning they are "not equal" Tsiyu Nov 2014 #48

I don't agree. LWolf Nov 2014 #52